ON Semiconductor Corporation

ON Technology · Semiconductors
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$73.70
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$44.56 — $134.92
-45% from high
Market cap
28.7B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
49.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Revenue fell 15.3% in 2025 while cash flow stayed positive and buybacks continued.

Bullish Beneish: -2.97Altman Z″: 6.23Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 15.9
RED DEEP 87 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.97
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
6.23
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
15.93
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The annual figures show a sharp downturn in profitability, not just in sales. Revenue declined 15.3% to $6 billion in 2025, while net income fell to $121 million from $1.57 billion and operating income fell to $84.2 million from $1.77 billion. Total assets dropped to $12.52 billion from $14.09 billion, equity fell to $7.67 billion from $8.8 billion, and long-term debt declined to $2.98 billion from $3.35 billion. The filings provided do not name the segments, products or legal matters behind these changes, so readers may want to look at the full 10-K business and MD&A sections. Four scores are provided. The Beneish M-Score is -2.975, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone; this is a screening result, not a finding about the company's books. The Altman Z″-Score is 6.23, in the safe zone, which indicates low financial distress risk on that model. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 9 computable signals, a middling reading across nine checks of profitability, leverage and efficiency. The Fog Index is 15.93, placing the MD&A in the hard-to-read band of 14 to 18, which means a reader needs more effort than average to follow the discussion. The repurchase activity, 5,709,322 shares in the quarter ended April 3, 2026, under a $6.0 billion program, is a capital-allocation choice that continued while earnings contracted. No news headlines are on file, and the risk factor and MD&A excerpts are largely boilerplate, so this verdict rests mainly on the financial statements and scores.

Catalyst.The MD&A excerpt for the 10-Q filed 2026-05-04 does not describe business drivers in detail. Its substantive content is forward-looking-statement cautions, the share repurchase table and the program description. The annual figures show revenue falling from $7.08 billion in 2024 to $6 billion in 2025, a decline of 15.3%, and operating income dropping to $84.2 million from $1.77 billion. In the quarter ended April 3, 2026, the company repurchased 5,709,322 shares under the New Share Repurchase Program approved in November 2025, which allows up to $6.0 billion of repurchases through December 31, 2028, with approximately $5.7 billion remaining. Readers may want to look at the full MD&A for the operating drivers behind the revenue decline, which the excerpt does not supply.

Hidden risk.The most easily missed tension is between cash flow and earnings. Net income fell to $121 million in 2025 from $1.57 billion in 2024, a drop of about 92%, yet operating cash flow was $1.76 billion. That makes the operating cash flow to net income ratio of 14.54 look strong, but the ratio is high mainly because the net income denominator shrank sharply, not because cash rose. Operating cash flow also declined from $1.91 billion. The Fog Index of 15.93 falls in the hard-to-read band, and the risk factor excerpt provided contains only forward-looking-statement language, so specific risks cannot be assessed from it.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ON reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
10.6%
of the shares available to trade
High
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
30M
Change since Aug 31
−0.7%
Days to cover
2.7

What it tells us

A large group of traders is betting that ON shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−0.7%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.7 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) ON Semiconductor filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 3, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030
    EDGAR →
  • May 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-04)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-14)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 9, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →