ON Semiconductor Corporation
ON Technology · SemiconductorsDeep value.
Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
ON Semiconductor Corporation’s 2026 10-Q begins its Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) with a notable emphasis on qualifying future statements. The company explicitly states that all forward-looking statements, defined as those using terms like “believes,” “estimates,” or “expects,” are based on current expectations and involve risks. Readers are “cautioned not to place undue reliance” on these statements, a common but important disclosure that sets the tone for interpreting the financial narrative. This immediate framing directs attention away from projections and towards the underlying risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
The forensic scores present a picture of relative stability. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.9748, well below the -1.78 threshold that would indicate elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 6.89, placing the company firmly in the “safe” category, significantly above the 2.60 benchmark. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, is 4.0, which is at the lower end of neutral, but not below the “weak” threshold. The Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — is 15.93, suggesting the filing is reasonably accessible.
The MD&A’s explicit reference to “important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially” found in Item 1A “Risk Factors” is a key directional signal. While the provided excerpt from Item 1A primarily details a glossary of terms, its inclusion of “ADAS” (Advanced driver-assistance systems) and “AI” (Artificial Intelligence) within this section underscores the technical nature of the company’s operational environment. This implies that a thorough understanding of the company’s risks and prospects requires familiarity with these specialized, high-growth technology domains, which are central to its business strategy.
This filing provides a clear view of the company’s current financial health through established forensic metrics and offers insight into management’s communication style. It highlights a company operating in complex technological sectors, as evidenced by the glossary of terms. However, the filing itself does not provide the necessary inputs to determine whether the security is mispriced. That assessment requires external analysis of the semiconductor industry’s competitive landscape, technological trends, and the company’s specific market positioning within the ADAS and AI segments, which are beyond the scope of this particular document.
Filing timeline
- May 7, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- May 6, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- May 4, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030Read →
- May 4, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-04)### Item 2.02 of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99 .1, is being furnished under... ### Item 2.02 and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for 0Read →
- Apr 2, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-05-14)0Read →
- Feb 9, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →