ON Semiconductor Corporation

ON Technology · Semiconductors
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$88.57
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$44.56 — $134.92
-34% from high
Market cap
34.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
65.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.97Altman Z″: 6.89Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 15.9
RED DEEP 87 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.97
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
6.89
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
15.93
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

ON Semiconductor Corporation’s 2026 10-Q begins its Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) with a notable emphasis on qualifying future statements. The company explicitly states that all forward-looking statements, defined as those using terms like “believes,” “estimates,” or “expects,” are based on current expectations and involve risks. Readers are “cautioned not to place undue reliance” on these statements, a common but important disclosure that sets the tone for interpreting the financial narrative. This immediate framing directs attention away from projections and towards the underlying risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.

The forensic scores present a picture of relative stability. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.9748, well below the -1.78 threshold that would indicate elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, stands at 6.89, placing the company firmly in the “safe” category, significantly above the 2.60 benchmark. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, is 4.0, which is at the lower end of neutral, but not below the “weak” threshold. The Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — is 15.93, suggesting the filing is reasonably accessible.

The MD&A’s explicit reference to “important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially” found in Item 1A “Risk Factors” is a key directional signal. While the provided excerpt from Item 1A primarily details a glossary of terms, its inclusion of “ADAS” (Advanced driver-assistance systems) and “AI” (Artificial Intelligence) within this section underscores the technical nature of the company’s operational environment. This implies that a thorough understanding of the company’s risks and prospects requires familiarity with these specialized, high-growth technology domains, which are central to its business strategy.

This filing provides a clear view of the company’s current financial health through established forensic metrics and offers insight into management’s communication style. It highlights a company operating in complex technological sectors, as evidenced by the glossary of terms. However, the filing itself does not provide the necessary inputs to determine whether the security is mispriced. That assessment requires external analysis of the semiconductor industry’s competitive landscape, technological trends, and the company’s specific market positioning within the ADAS and AI segments, which are beyond the scope of this particular document.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • May 6, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • May 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-03)Period: 2026-04-030
    Read →
  • May 4, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-04)### Item 2.02 of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99 .1, is being furnished under... ### Item 2.02 and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for 0
    Read →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-14)0
    Read →
  • Feb 9, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about ON's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →