NVR, Inc.

NVR Consumer Cyclical · Residential Construction
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$5,940.83
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$5,501.01 — $8,200.00
-28% from high
Market cap
15.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
15.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

NVR's first-quarter 2026 revenue fell 22% as margins compressed and backlog value declined.

Bullish Beneish: -2.32Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 17.5
RED DEEP 76 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.32
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.50
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings describe a company whose reported profits are falling faster than its order volume is rising, and management's language about strength sits uneasily beside the numbers. Revenue for 2025 was $10.32 billion, down 1.9% from $10.52 billion, and net income fell to $1.34 billion from $1.68 billion. In the first quarter of 2026, revenue fell 22% to $1.88 billion, and the homebuilding gross margin dropped to 19.6% from 21.9%. Management says it is well positioned because of its balance sheet and disciplined lot acquisition strategy. Those strengths are visible: equity was $3.86 billion and liabilities were $1.99 billion at December 31, 2025. Operating cash flow of $1.12 billion in 2025 was 0.84 times net income, so cash generation trailed reported profit but was not far below it. The Beneish M-Score is -2.322, which is below the -1.78 threshold and labeled not in the elevated zone, so this screen does not flag manipulation risk, though a screen cannot rule out problems it does not measure. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 6 computable signals, a mixed reading that means the company passed four of the six signals that could be computed, not a clean result. The Fog Index of 17.50 falls in the 14 to 18 band labeled hard to read, so readers may want to look at the land, backlog and cancellation tables directly rather than rely on the narrative summary. Backlog units were flat at 10,171, but backlog dollars fell 3% to $4.70 billion, and the cancellation rate improved to 13.8% from 15.5%. Readers may want to watch whether margins and deposit impairments change as the company works through its controlled position of about 181,700 lots.

Catalyst.Management attributes the first-quarter 2026 slowdown to affordability problems, high inventory in some markets, weak consumer sentiment and economic volatility, and expects those issues to keep weighing on demand and home prices. Homebuilding revenue fell 22% to $1.83 billion as settled units dropped from 5,133 to 4,015, driven by a 15% smaller backlog entering the year. New orders rose 7% to 5,738 units, helped by an 8% increase in average active communities, but the average new order price fell 2% to $440.1 thousand, mainly from a shift to lower-priced communities in the North East segment. Net income was $198.4 million, down 34% from the prior-year quarter.

Hidden risk.The most easily missed tension is between the lot-control model and the cash at stake in it. The company holds about $1.00 billion of cash deposits under lot purchase agreements, and the 10-K warns that these deposits may be forfeited if the company restructures or ceases building in a community. As of March 31, 2026, the filing reports a $113.5 million contract land deposit impairment allowance covering about 18,900 lots. Raw land contracts add $48.1 million of deposits, of which $12.9 million is refundable only if certain conditions are not met. The Fog Index of 17.50 means the MD&A is hard to read, so these figures sit in dense text that many readers may skim past.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what NVR reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
8.2%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
143.4K
Change since Aug 31
+32.7%
Days to cover
3.5

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that NVR shares will fall.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 32.7% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.5 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) NVR filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • May 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-07)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-22)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 17, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-07)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →