Nucor Corporation
NUE Basic Materials · SteelDeep value.
Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Nucor’s 2025 10-K filing presents a financial picture that, at first glance, appears robust according to standard forensic metrics. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.4194. This figure rests well below the -1.78 threshold that typically signals elevated manipulation risk, suggesting the company’s reported earnings are not exhibiting the common statistical patterns associated with aggressive accounting. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) itself is structured to discuss financial condition and results of operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, directing readers to prior filings for earlier comparative data.
Further supporting this view, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 5.01. This places Nucor comfortably within the “safe” zone, which is defined as scores above 2.60, indicating a low probability of financial distress. The Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, yields a respectable 6.0. While not reaching the “strong” category of 7 or higher, this score suggests reasonable fundamental health and operational efficiency. The Fog Index, a readability score, was not available for this filing, precluding an assessment of its textual complexity.
The MD&A, Item 7, outlines its scope by stating it “discusses our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.” It then explicitly directs readers that “Information concerning the year ended December 31, 2024 and a comparison of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 may be found” in the prior year’s 10-K. This structure means a comprehensive three-year financial trend analysis requires consulting multiple filings, a common practice that nonetheless adds a step to the reader’s due diligence process.
This forensic reading, anchored strictly to the provided excerpts and quantitative scores, suggests a company with a sound financial reporting foundation and no immediate red flags from a manipulation or distress perspective. However, the limited scope of the provided MD&A and risk factor excerpts means this analysis cannot comment on specific operational challenges, competitive dynamics within the basic materials sector, or the company’s strategic outlook. A complete understanding necessitates a full review of the 10-K and its preceding filings.
Filing timeline
- Apr 27, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-04-27)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Mar 27, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-05-14)0Read →
- Mar 3, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-27)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Feb 25, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310Read →
- Feb 20, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-19)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Nov 12, 202510-QQuarterly report (2025-10-04)Period: 2025-10-040Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →