NetApp, Inc.
NTAP Technology · Software - InfrastructureDeep value.
Profit rose and debt climbed while operating cash flow fell at NetApp in fiscal 2025.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The Beneish M-Score is -2.436, which the label places below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result, not a clearance of every accounting question, but it does not flag the company for the manipulation pattern the model tests. The Altman Z″-Score of 1.66 falls in the grey zone between 1.10 and 2.60, so it is neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed and calls for a closer read of the balance sheet. The Piotroski F-Score is 7 of 9 computable signals, meaning the company passed 7 of the nine standard profitability, leverage, and efficiency tests the data could compute. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.27 means cash generation exceeded reported earnings in fiscal 2025, though operating cash flow fell in the same year net income rose. The risk factors cite gross margin pressure from NAND component costs, tariffs, pricing actions, and rising logistics costs, and state that the company has already experienced negative margin effects. Revenue growth of 4.9% is modest. In the quarter ended January 23, 2026, the company repurchased 1,806 thousand shares, with $702 million remaining under its repurchase program. Readers may want to look at how these buybacks are funded given the rise in long-term debt and the decline in equity. The strategy described in the business section depends on executing a costly systems and cost-structure transition, which the filing itself identifies as a source of operating risk.
Catalyst.Fiscal 2025 revenue reached $6.57 billion, up 4.9% from $6.27 billion, and net income rose to $1.19 billion from $986 million. Operating income increased to $1.34 billion from $1.21 billion. The business section centers growth on its unified storage platform, ONTAP and BlueXP, and on data infrastructure for AI workloads, with integration across Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. The 10-Q for the quarter ended January 23, 2026 also describes an ongoing ERP transition, with the final phase scheduled for the third quarter of fiscal 2026.
Hidden risk.The balance-sheet and cash-flow figures show a tension a casual reader could miss. Operating cash flow fell to $1.51 billion from $1.69 billion even as net income rose. Total liabilities increased to $9.78 billion from $8.74 billion, long-term debt climbed to $2.48 billion from $1.99 billion, and equity declined to $1.04 billion from $1.15 billion. The 10-Q also reports that the ERP transition has already disrupted order processing and invoicing, and says it could affect vendor payments, financial reporting, and internal controls.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 10.7M
- Change since Aug 31
- −0.5%
- Days to cover
- 4.0
What it tells us
A noticeable minority of traders is betting that NTAP shares will fall.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−0.5%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.0 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) NetApp filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Sep 11, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 3.03: Change to shareholder rights; Item 5.03: Charter or bylaw change; fiscal-year change; Item 5.07: Shareholder vote resultsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Sep 2, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Sep 2, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-01-23)Period: 2026-01-230EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-26)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Jan 12, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-01-08)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Nov 25, 20258-KCurrent report (2025-11-25)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Jul 25, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-09-10)0EDGAR →
- Jun 9, 202510-KAnnual report (2025-04-25)Period: 2025-04-250EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →