NetApp, Inc.

NTAP Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$155.06
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$93.69 — $192.83
-20% from high
Market cap
30.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
136.0%
P/E
24.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.44Altman Z″: 2.53Piotroski: 7/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.44
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.53
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

NetApp’s most recent 10-Q, filed February 26, 2026, presents a filing that, by its own account, offers little in the way of new concerns. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) notes no material changes to the Company’s risk factors since the prior Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 25, 2025. This stated stability aligns with a Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), of 7.0. This score, out of a possible 9, suggests sound financial health across profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency criteria. While the risk profile remains consistent, the MD&A still dedicates significant attention to the complex, multi-faceted influences on gross margins, a key profitability metric that the company acknowledges can fluctuate.

The forensic scores offer a nuanced perspective on NetApp’s financial posture. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.4359. This value, being less than the -1.78 threshold, suggests a lower probability of earnings manipulation based on historical accounting patterns. Meanwhile, Altman’s Z″, Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, sits at 2.53. This places the company squarely in the “grey zone” (1.10–2.60), indicating some potential for financial distress but not an immediate threat of bankruptcy. The strong Piotroski F-Score of 7.0, as noted, provides a counterpoint to the Altman Z″‘s cautionary signal, suggesting underlying operational strength and prudent financial management.

Despite the stated stability in risk factors, Item 7 of the MD&A elaborates on the specific factors influencing gross margins. The company acknowledges that gross margins may fluctuate, influenced by macroeconomic volatility, competitive pricing, component and product design costs, inflation, and foreign exchange currency fluctuations. Furthermore, the volume and relative mix of revenues from product sales, software support, hardware support, and other services offerings also play a significant role. These detailed considerations highlight that while no new risks are identified, existing operational dynamics are complex and subject to numerous external and internal pressures. The filing explicitly states that factors such as increased component and labor costs, pricing pressures, or shifts in revenue mix could negatively impact our revenues, gross margins or earnings, underscoring the ongoing challenge of managing profitability in a dynamic market.

This filing provides a snapshot of NetApp’s financial health and management’s perspective on its risk landscape as of January 23, 2026. It offers insights into the company’s accounting practices via the Beneish M-Score and its fundamental strength through the Piotroski F-Score. However, the document does not offer a definitive forecast for future performance or market position beyond its reporting period. It cannot predict the precise trajectory of macroeconomic volatility, competitive pricing pressures, or the future mix of product and service revenues. While the filing details what influences gross margins, it does not prescribe how these complex challenges will be overcome, nor does it comment on the security’s intrinsic value or future price movements.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-01-23)Period: 2026-01-230
    Read →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-26)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On February 26, 2026, NetApp, Inc. ("NetApp" or the "Company") issued a press release reporting fi0
    Read →
  • Jan 12, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-08)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0
    Read →
  • Nov 25, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-11-25)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On November 25, 2025, NetApp, Inc. ("NetApp" or the "Company") issued a press release reporting fi0
    Read →
  • Jul 25, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-09-10)0
    Read →
  • Jun 9, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-04-25)Period: 2025-04-250
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about NTAP's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →