NRG Energy, Inc.

NRG Utilities · Utilities - Independent Power Producers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$149.11
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$120.11 — $189.96
-22% from high
Market cap
31.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
127.0%
P/E
163.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral Beneish: -2.37Altman Z″: 2.08Piotroski: 5/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.37
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.08
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

NRG Energy, Inc.’s 2026 10-Q, filed May 6, 2026, offers a concise update, noting no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting estimates since the 2025 Form 10-K. This direct reference to the prior annual filing for foundational accounting principles sets the stage for a document primarily focused on ongoing operational exposures rather than a re-evaluation of core policies. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) quickly transitions to outlining the various market risks inherent in the company’s business model, emphasizing the dynamic environment faced by utilities and independent power producers. This approach suggests a continuity in financial reporting, with the quarterly filing serving to update on specific risk categories rather than re-establishing core accounting methodologies.

The forensic scores present a mixed but not alarming picture. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.3671, which falls below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting no elevated risk of earnings manipulation. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 2.08. This places the company in the “grey zone” (1.10–2.60), indicating some potential for distress but not immediate alarm. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, comes in at 5.0. This score is neither strong nor weak, suggesting a neutral fundamental position based on profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency criteria.

Item 7 of the MD&A explicitly details the company’s exposure to market risks, stating that NRG is exposed to several market risks in the Company’s normal business activities. These include “commodity price risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and currency exchange risk.” For an independent power producer operating in a regulated yet volatile sector, this comprehensive listing is not unexpected but underscores the inherent uncertainties in its operating environment. The discussion emphasizes that market risk represents the potential loss from market changes impacting retail operations, merchant power generation, or existing or forecasted financial or commodity transactions. This section serves as an update to the more extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk presented in the prior 10-K, signaling management’s ongoing vigilance over these core financial exposures.

This quarterly filing provides a snapshot of NRG’s financial reporting posture and its acknowledged risk landscape. It confirms a stable accounting policy environment and offers a quantitative perspective on financial health through established forensic metrics. The absence of a high Beneish M-Score or a low Altman Z″ suggests no immediate red flags from these indicators. However, the document does not offer a definitive verdict on whether the security is mispriced. That assessment would necessitate a granular analysis of the specific market risks identified—commodity price fluctuations, creditworthiness of counterparties, interest rate trajectories, and currency movements—alongside a broader understanding of the regulatory landscape, competitive pressures, and capital expenditure requirements for utilities. The filing describes the company’s operations and risks; it does not provide a valuation.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-06)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 6, 2026, NRG Energy, Inc . issued a press release announcing its financial results for the qu0
    Read →
  • May 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • May 1, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . NRG Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) held its annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meetin0
    Read →
  • Apr 28, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-28)### Unknown Item this Current Report are also responsive to this... ### Item 2.03 and are incorporated herein by reference .... 0
    Read →
  • Mar 18, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-30)0
    Read →
  • Feb 24, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about NRG's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →