ServiceNow, Inc.

NOW Technology · Software - Application
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$148.57
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$81.24 — $192.97
-23% from high
Market cap
153.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
86.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Revenue rose 20.9% to $13.28 billion as operating cash flow reached $5.44 billion.

Neutral Beneish: -2.93Altman Z″: 2.18
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.93
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.18
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filing data supports a strong top-line and cash picture for 2025, with some items a careful reader should verify. Revenue reached $13.28 billion, up 20.9% from $10.98 billion, and operating income rose to $1.82 billion from $1.36 billion. Operating cash flow of $5.44 billion was 3.11 times net income of $1.75 billion, a gap that is worth understanding rather than assuming. The MD&A emphasizes ratable recognition of cloud subscription revenue over the contract term, so reported revenue lags bookings, and the risk factors note that a decrease in new subscriptions may not show up immediately in operating results. Equity rose to $12.96 billion, while liabilities reached $13.07 billion, up from $10.77 billion. The risk factors also cite debt service obligations and reliance on partners for a growing share of revenue. On the forensic scores, the Beneish M-Score is -2.926, which is below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening result rather than proof that the numbers are accurate. The Altman Z″-Score is 2.18, in the grey zone between 1.10 and 2.60, which means the model does not place the company clearly in either the distress or safe range; it is a rough indicator, not a forecast of financial trouble. The Piotroski F-Score and Fog Index are not on file for this synthesis, so no value is cited for either. Readers may want to look at the California valuation allowance, which rose to $241 million from $220 million, and at the long-term revenue growth decline the company itself expects in its risk factors.

Catalyst.According to the MD&A, the company derives its revenues predominately from subscription revenues, which give customers access to its service over the subscription term, with cloud revenue recognized ratably. Revenue rose 20.9% to $13.28 billion in 2025 from $10.98 billion in 2024, and operating income increased to $1.82 billion from $1.36 billion. Operating cash flow reached $5.44 billion, up from $4.27 billion. The risk factors describe customers adopting AI-native solutions and modern cloud infrastructure as a demand driver, but the excerpt provided does not quantify how much of the 2025 growth came from any specific product or segment.

Hidden risk.A casual reader may miss how much 2023 earnings were shaped by tax accounting. The MD&A states the company released $1.05 billion of its valuation allowance during 2023, a release that would produce a material income tax benefit and therefore lift reported net income in that year. Net income then fell to $1.43 billion in 2024 from $1.73 billion in 2023 before rising to $1.75 billion in 2025. The filing also keeps a $241 million California valuation allowance, and the risk factors warn that revenue growth is expected to decline over the long term and that partners supply a growing share of revenue. Readers may want to look at how these tax and growth items affect year-over-year comparisons of reported profit.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what NOW reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.9%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
29.7M
Change since Aug 31
−2.1%
Days to cover
2.2

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against NOW. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−2.1%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.2 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) ServiceNow filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Jul 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-13)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-10)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 12, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-05)0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 30, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →