Nasdaq, Inc.

NDAQ Financial Services · Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$76.85
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$76.76 — $101.79
-25% from high
Market cap
43.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
143.0%
P/E
23.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.43Altman Z″: 2.49Piotroski: 9/9
RED DEEP 83 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.43
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.49
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
9
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Nasdaq’s 2026 10-Q MD&A, or Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, offers a lean narrative, frequently directing readers to other sections for key disclosures. For instance, discussions of off-balance sheet arrangements are explicitly referred to Note 14, “Clearing Operations,” for non-cash default fund contributions and margin deposits, and Note 17, “Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees,” for guarantees and credit facilities. This approach emphasizes the interconnectedness of the filing’s components, requiring a full read beyond just Item 7. Within Item 3, the company also notes its exposure to market risks such as interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk, alongside credit risk, arising from its operating, investing, and financing activities. This highlights the diverse financial exposures inherent in its business model.

The forensic scores present a mixed but generally robust picture. The Beneish M-Score, Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, registers at -2.4345, which is below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting no elevated risk of earnings manipulation based on its accounting choices. Altman’s Z″, Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, sits at 2.49, placing it within the 1.10–2.60 “grey” zone, indicating neither clear distress nor outright safety, but rather a need for continued monitoring of its financial health. Conversely, the Piotroski F-Score, Piotroski’s 2000 9-point fundamental strength scan, comes in at a perfect 9.0, signaling strong fundamental health across its profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency criteria. This perfect score suggests a company performing well on traditional financial metrics.

Item 7’s discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements is notable for its brevity, explicitly referring the reader to specific financial statement notes for details. This includes Note 14, “Clearing Operations,” for non-cash default fund contributions and margin deposits received, and Note 17, “Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees,” for guarantees issued and credit facilities available. Such cross-referencing is standard practice, but it underscores that a complete understanding of the company’s financial position, particularly regarding contingent liabilities and potential future obligations, requires diligent navigation beyond the MD&A itself. These arrangements can represent significant exposures not immediately apparent from the primary financial statements alone, making the detailed notes crucial for a comprehensive forensic review.

This filing provides a snapshot of Nasdaq’s reported financial condition and management’s perspective on key risks and financial disclosures for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. It offers insights into the company’s accounting practices and the transparency of its reporting, particularly through the explicit cross-referencing of critical financial details to other notes. What it does not provide is a definitive answer regarding the security’s market valuation or its future trajectory amidst evolving market dynamics. That assessment requires external analysis of competitive landscapes, regulatory changes, and broader economic trends, which are beyond the scope of this particular 10-Q’s disclosures. The document primarily serves as a factual account of the company’s financial state, not a predictive tool for investment outcomes.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-10)0
    Read →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 23, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-23)### Unknown Item sults of Operations and Financial Condition” and “... ### Unknown Item gulation FD Disclosure” is intended to be furnished pursuant to... ###0
    Read →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)### Unknown Item sults of Operations and Financial Condition” and “... ### Unknown Item gulation FD Disclosure” is intended to be furnished pursuant to... ###0
    Read →
  • Jan 16, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-14)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about NDAQ's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →