Micron Technology, Inc.
MU Technology · SemiconductorsDeep value.
Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Micron Technology’s 2026 10-Q, an interim quarterly report, presents a concise update, notably stating “no significant changes to our critical accounting estimates” since the prior fiscal year’s 10-K. This observation, found in Item 7, suggests a period of reporting stability, which can reduce the typical scrutiny applied to shifts in revenue recognition or expense accruals. The document also refers readers to the August 28, 2025 10-K for detailed discussions on market risk and critical accounting estimates, implying continuity rather than new developments in these areas during the reporting period.
The forensic scores derived from the filing present a picture of financial health. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector (M-Score) registers at -2.8151, well below the -1.78 threshold that would indicate elevated manipulation risk. Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 17.15, placing the company firmly in the “safe” zone, far from the 1.10 distress threshold. Furthermore, the Piotroski F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, achieves a strong 7.0, suggesting robust operational and financial performance across its criteria.
Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, reinforces this stability by noting no material changes to our market risk since the previous annual report. This consistency in reporting suggests that the company’s exposure to interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations has remained within previously disclosed parameters. The Risk Factors section, while not providing a Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — does list the repayment of “2028 Notes” in October 2025 and “2029 A Notes” in February 2026, indicating active management of debt obligations.
This filing, while providing a snapshot of strong forensic scores and stable accounting disclosures, does not offer a complete picture for investment decisions. It cannot predict future market demand for semiconductors, the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) trends, or the competitive landscape. The limited excerpts preclude a deep dive into specific operational challenges or opportunities. Therefore, while the filing suggests a fundamentally sound entity, a comprehensive assessment would require integrating this data with broader industry analysis and a more detailed review of the most recent annual report.
Filing timeline
- Apr 1, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-03-31)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Mar 25, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-03-25)No specific items found in 8-K.0Read →
- Mar 19, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-02-26)Period: 2026-02-260Read →
- Mar 18, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-03-18)### Item 2.02 and Exhibit 99 .1 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 0Read →
- Nov 25, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-01-15)0Read →
- Oct 3, 202510-KAnnual report (2025-08-28)Period: 2025-08-280Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →