MasTec, Inc.
MTZ Industrials · Engineering & ConstructionNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for MTZ yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
The numbers show a company whose revenue has grown over the period in the data, from $6.61 billion in 2017 to $12.3 billion in 2024, but whose profit has been uneven. Net income was $347.21 million in 2017, $392.33 million in 2019, $328.83 million in 2021, $33.35 million in 2022 and a loss of $49.95 million in 2023, before returning to $162.79 million in 2024. On the balance sheet, total assets declined from $9.37 billion at the end of 2023 to $8.98 billion at the end of 2024, and total liabilities fell from $6.65 billion to $5.99 billion. Subtracting liabilities from assets gives an implied equity of about $2.99 billion for 2024 versus about $2.72 billion for 2023. That is a simple calculation from the reported totals, not a figure stated in the filing. The company's risk factors describe exposure to electricity, fire and explosion hazards, to large damage claims that could substantially exceed the amount charged for the work, and to self-insured liabilities whose effects can remain unknown for years. The filing also references potential litigation under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws, customer change-order disputes, and litigation accruals whose adequacy depends on management estimates. Forensic scores: no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score or Fog Index is on file for this company in the data provided, so this synthesis gives no score values and draws no conclusion from them. Readers may want to look at the full Item 7 segment discussion and the notes on insurance reserves and contingencies, which are not in this excerpt, to test whether the 2024 recovery holds up.
Catalyst.The most recent annual results in the data are for fiscal 2024: revenues were $12.3 billion, up from $12 billion in 2023, roughly 2.5% growth, while net income moved to $162.79 million from a net loss of $49.95 million in 2023. The 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2025 was filed February 26, 2026, but the excerpt provided covers risk and accounting text rather than the segment-level MD&A results discussion, so the specific 2025 business drivers cannot be confirmed from this data. The risk factors tie demand to customers in communications, energy and utilities, and to federal programs such as the IIJA and IRA, which the company says fund many of the markets in which it operates.
Hidden risk.The most easily missed tension is between the improved 2024 profit and the self-insurance exposure described in the risk factors. The company says it is effectively self-insured for substantially all claims because most claims do not exceed its deductibles, and it manages some liabilities through a wholly-owned captive insurance company. Insurers have reduced wildfire coverage and raised its cost, which the filing says has increased reliance on self-insurance. Separately, the risk factors note that the July 2025 OBBBA accelerated the phaseout of clean energy credits for solar and wind, and that tariffs have raised costs of steel, concrete, copper and solar panels.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 4.6M
- Change since Aug 31
- −13.5%
- Days to cover
- 3.0
What it tells us
A noticeable minority of traders is betting that MTZ shares will fall.
Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 13.5% since the Aug 31 report.
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.0 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) MasTec filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Aug 17, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligationEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Aug 10, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other eventsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Jul 31, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 9.01: Financial Statements and Exhibits0EDGAR →
- Jul 30, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Jul 30, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)EDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Jul 20, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation0EDGAR →
- Apr 9, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-05-21)0EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-26)Unknown Item this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in this...0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →