Motorola Solutions, Inc.

MSI Technology · Communication Equipment
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$456.39
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$359.36 — $494.85
-8% from high
Market cap
75.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.1%
P/E
35.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

2025 profit rose as revenue grew 8.0%, but long-term debt climbed to $8.41 billion.

Neutral Beneish: -2.45Altman Z″: 1.69Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.45
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.69
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the filings show reported profits and cash generation growing while the balance sheet became more leveraged. Full-year 2025 net income was $2.15 billion versus $1.58 billion in 2024. Operating cash flow of $2.84 billion was 1.32 times net income, meaning cash generation exceeded reported profit. Equity turned positive in 2022 and reached $2.41 billion in 2025, after several years of negative equity from 2018 through 2021. These improvements are real, but the rise in long-term debt to $8.41 billion, alongside the Silvus purchase, explains much of the increase in leverage. Readers may want to look at the debt footnotes and the commercial paper discussion in the MD&A to understand how that borrowing is structured. The forensic scores give a mixed picture. The Beneish M-Score is -2.445. It is below -1.78 and not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening result, not proof that the earnings are accurate. The Altman Z″-Score is 1.69, which falls in the grey zone between 1.10 and 2.60. That means the model does not place the company clearly in either the safe or the distress range. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 9 computable signals, meaning six of the nine checklist tests on profitability, leverage and efficiency were met. Readers may want to look at which signals were not met and why. The MD&A also flags tariff and supply-chain pressure. After the February 20, 2026 Supreme Court ruling invalidated IEEPA tariffs, the Court of International Trade ordered refunds, and CBP launched its CAPE refund system on April 20, 2026. Memory cost increases tied to AI demand affect the Products and Systems Integration segment, whose first-quarter operating margin fell sharply. Management's view of these pressures should be weighed against the reported numbers rather than accepted on its own terms.

Catalyst.Management's MD&A centers on growth in the Software and Services segment. In the first quarter of 2026, net sales rose to $2.7 billion from $2.5 billion, and Software and Services grew 18% to $1,155 million, driven by MCN, Command Center and Video, including acquired revenue. The company completed several acquisitions across 2025 and early 2026: Silvus Technologies for $4.4 billion (August 6, 2025), RapidDeploy for $240 million, Theatro for $174 million, and Exacom and Hyper in March 2026. For full-year 2025, revenue rose 8.0% to $11.68 billion. The MD&A also cites higher memory costs tied to AI-driven demand as a current pressure on products.

Hidden risk.The most easily missed tension is between reported earnings and balance-sheet leverage. Long-term debt rose to $8.41 billion at year-end 2025 from $5.67 billion a year earlier. First-quarter 2026 interest expense, net, was $104 million versus $51 million a year earlier. Operating earnings fell to $525 million from $582 million, and the Products and Systems Integration operating margin dropped to 13.7% from 22.8%. The MD&A also states that no asset had been recognized for potential tariff refunds as of April 4, 2026, so any refund remains unrecorded. First-quarter operating cash flow declined to $451 million from $510 million.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what MSI reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.3%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
3.2M
Change since Aug 31
−1.8%
Days to cover
3.5

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against MSI. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−1.8%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.5 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Motorola Solutions filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-04-04)Period: 2026-04-040
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-07)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-18)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-12)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-11)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →