Microsoft Corporation

MSFT Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$368.57
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$349.20 — $555.45
-34% from high
Market cap
2.7T
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
98.0%
P/E
22.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.57Altman Z″: 8.44Piotroski: 8/9Fog: 18.7
RED DEEP 95 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.57
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
8.44
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
8
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
18.73
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Microsoft’s 2025 10-Q opens its Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) with a commitment to making digital technology and artificial intelligence (“AI”) available broadly, framing AI as central to its mission to “empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more.” Despite this forward-looking vision, the filing itself presents a readability challenge, with a Fog Index — readability score where 12 equals a newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscation (Gunning, 1952) — of 18.73. The company reported robust financial results, with total revenue of $81,273 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025, an increase from $69,632 million in the prior year period, driven significantly by service and other revenue.

The forensic scores generally paint a picture of financial robustness. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, registers at -2.5685, falling outside the range typically associated with elevated manipulation risk (Beneish, 1999). Similarly, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — stands at 8.06, placing the company firmly in the ‘safe’ category, well above the 2.60 threshold (Altman, 1968). Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), yields a 7.0, indicating strong fundamental health based on profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. These metrics collectively suggest a company operating with sound financial practices.

Item 7, the MD&A, immediately establishes Microsoft’s strategic direction, highlighting its commitment to making digital technology and artificial intelligence (“AI”) available broadly. This framing positions AI not just as a product, but as foundational to their stated mission, suggesting that future financial performance is increasingly intertwined with the successful integration and monetization of AI-powered solutions. The reported service and other revenue, at $64,822 million for the quarter, underscores the current scale of these offerings. The MD&A also notes its supplementary nature, directing readers to the prior 10-K for a complete understanding, which is standard practice for a 10-Q but emphasizes the need for a broader context beyond this interim report.

This 10-Q, while presenting strong financial metrics and forensic scores, offers a snapshot of operational health and strategic direction, particularly regarding AI. It does not, however, provide the necessary inputs to determine whether the security is mispriced. Such an assessment would require a deeper dive into the competitive landscape for AI platforms, the long-term sustainability of the reported revenue growth, and a detailed valuation model considering future cash flows and market multiples. The filing confirms robust current performance and a clear strategic focus, but the question of mispricing remains outside its scope, requiring external market analysis and forward-looking projections.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-28)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Dec 8, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-12-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Oct 29, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-10-28)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Oct 21, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-05)0
    Read →
  • Jul 30, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-30)Period: 2025-06-300
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about MSFT's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Recent material news

What the desk read this week

Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →