Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

MRSH Financial Services · Insurance Brokers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$186.54
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$156.60 — $198.49
-6% from high
Market cap
89B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.2%
P/E
22.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Revenue rose 10.3% in 2025, while debt and uninsured legal exposures deserve close reading.

Bullish Beneish: -2.47Altman Z″: 2.86Piotroski: 7/9Fog: 17.2
RED DEEP 95 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.47
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
2.86
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.16
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings describe a business whose revenue and operating income have risen each year since 2022, but whose balance sheet has become more leveraged since 2023. The Beneish M-Score is -2.472, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening model, and the result does not indicate that the reported figures are wrong. The Piotroski F-Score is 7 of 8 computable signals, which is a high count on the simple profitability, leverage and efficiency checks it runs. The Altman Z″-Score is 2.86, in the safe zone, but the label notes that Altman Z is not designed for banks or financial firms, so this result should be treated with caution for a brokerage and consulting firm. The Fog Index of 17.16 falls in the hard-to-read band of 14 to 18, which matters because the MD&A is where management explains results in its own words. Operating cash flow of $5.29 billion was 1.27 times net income of $4.16 billion in 2025, which suggests cash generation has kept pace with reported profit. Narrative items worth tracing in the filings include the Thrive program and Business Client Services, which the risk factors say may not be fully realized, Mercer's Wealth business, the defined benefit pension plan obligations, and the decline in fiduciary income that the risk factors tie to lower interest rates. Equity method investments of about $327 million add a smaller exposure. Taken together, the scores do not flag manipulation, but the debt built up since 2023 and the dense MD&A language are the parts that call for a closer read.

Catalyst.According to the 2025 annual figures, revenues rose to $26.98 billion from $24.46 billion, a 10.3% year-over-year increase. Operating income reached $6.22 billion versus $5.82 billion in 2024, and net income reached $4.16 billion versus $4.06 billion. In the 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2026, management reports that the company repurchased 11.4 million shares for $2.0 billion over the nine months and remains authorized to buy back about $3.7 billion more. The MD&A also says roughly 52% of total revenue is non-U.S. based, and a 10% move across major currencies would change full-year net operating income by about $129 million.

Hidden risk.The most material tension may be the debt level. Long-term debt was $18.32 billion at the end of 2025, down from $19.43 billion in 2024 but up from $11.84 billion in 2023. Equity was $15.31 billion, so long-term debt was roughly 1.20 times equity. The risk factors say the current debt level could adversely affect financial flexibility and that credit rating downgrades would raise financing costs. The risk factors also describe significant uninsured exposures from errors and omissions and breach of fiduciary duty claims. Readers may want to look at Note 17, which the filing incorporates by reference, for the claims detail.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what MRSH reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.3%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
6.3M
Change since Aug 31
−4.1%
Days to cover
2.3

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against MRSH. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−4.1%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.3 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Marsh & McLennan filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-10-15)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 15, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-09-30)Period: 2026-09-300
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 21, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-07-21)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 21, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-06-02)Item 1.02: Ended a material agreement; Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 16, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-16)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-08)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 31, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-21)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-10)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 9, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →