Monster Beverage Corporation

MNST Consumer Defensive · Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$45.34
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$32.94 — $50.17
-10% from high
Market cap
88.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
42.0
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for MNST yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filing data on file is limited to two income statement lines, revenues and operating income, for fiscal years 2018 through 2025. Several pieces that a careful reader would normally weigh are missing: there are no forensic scores on file, no MD&A narrative, no risk-factor text, and no classified news headlines. Because of this, this synthesis does not assign values to any forensic score and does not characterize the company's accounting quality through a screening model. For readers learning to read filings, the forensic scores they may encounter elsewhere work as follows. The Beneish M-Score is a statistical screen built from several year-over-year ratios between receivables, margins, asset quality, and growth; a score in an elevated zone is a flag that calls for closer reading of the filing, not proof of manipulation. The Piotroski F-Score counts how many of a set of profitability, leverage, and efficiency tests a company passes, and it is stated as a count of computable signals rather than a score out of nine unless all nine are computable. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from balance sheet and earnings ratios, and its zones are interpreted with caution for banks and other financial firms. The Fog Index estimates the reading level of a document. None of these were provided here, so none can be interpreted for this company. The revenue and operating income figures themselves are straightforward to check against the company's annual report, and the growth rates and margins in this synthesis are simple calculations from those figures. Readers may want to look at the MD&A, the risk factors, and the cash flow statement in the same filing to test whether the 2025 improvement in operating income is matched by cash generation and whether the 2024 margin decline has a documented explanation.

Catalyst.The data on file does not include MD&A text, so this synthesis cannot name the products, markets, or programs behind the growth. The numbers show revenue rising from $7.49 billion in 2024 to $8.29 billion in 2025, an increase of about 10.7%, after growth of about 4.9% in 2024 from $7.14 billion. Operating income rose from $1.93 billion in 2024 to $2.42 billion in 2025, an increase of about 25.4%. Operating margin, meaning operating income divided by revenue, was about 29.2% in 2025 compared with about 25.8% in 2024. Readers may want to look at the MD&A section of the company's annual report to see management's explanation of these drivers.

Hidden risk.No risk-factor text is on file, so this synthesis cannot describe the risks management has disclosed. The reported numbers show one tension worth noting. In 2024, revenue rose by $350 million, yet operating income fell by $20 million, from $1.95 billion to $1.93 billion, and operating margin dropped from about 27.3% to about 25.8%. The 2025 rebound does not explain why costs grew faster than sales in 2024, and the data on file does not show the cause. No cash flow or balance sheet figures are on file either, so the data cannot confirm whether reported operating income is matched by cash generation.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what MNST reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.2%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
45.4M
Change since Aug 31
+3.5%
Days to cover
4.4

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against MNST. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+3.5%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.4 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Monster Beverage filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 25, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →