3M Company

MMM Industrials · Conglomerates
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$162.43
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$139.34 — $177.41
-8% from high
Market cap
84.7B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
190.0%
P/E
31.4
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

The 3M Company’s 2026 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, details a $7 million Loss on business divestitures within its operating expenses (2026 10-Q, Item 1). This specific, non-recurring item contributes to total operating expenses of $4,633 million, down from $4,708 million in the prior year period, even as net sales increased to $6,030 million from $5,954 million. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) outlines its own structure, explicitly stating its design to provide a “narrative from the perspective of management” (2026 10-Q, Item 7). This section is presented in distinct parts, including “Overview,” “Results of Operations,” and “Financial Condition and Liquidity,” indicating a clear framework for the discussion of the company’s performance. The MD&A also points to “Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I, Item 2, which “may involve risks and uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from those projected.”

The quantitative forensic indicators for this filing are not available, which constrains a full algorithmic assessment. Beneish’s M-Score (Beneish, 1999) — an eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector — is absent. Altman’s Z″ (Altman, 1968) — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — is similarly unavailable. Piotroski’s F-Score (Piotroski, 2000) — a 9-point fundamental strength scan — cannot be computed. Furthermore, the Fog Index (Gunning, 1952) — a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscation — is also not provided. This collective absence means the filing cannot be directly evaluated against established benchmarks for earnings quality, financial distress, fundamental strength, or textual clarity.

The MD&A’s explicit declaration that it is designed to provide a “narrative from the perspective of management” (2026 10-Q, Item 7) is a crucial framing device. This statement underscores that the subsequent discussion of financial condition and results is curated through a specific lens, rather than presented as raw data. Within this narrative, the Consolidated Statement of Income reveals shifts in operating expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased significantly from $945 million to $744 million year-over-year, while research, development and related expenses saw an increase from $285 million to $308 million. Cost of sales also increased, from $3,478 million to $3,574 million. These movements, alongside the $7 million loss on divestitures, collectively shaped the reported operating income for the quarter.

This filing provides a snapshot of 3M Company’s reported financial performance for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, including specific revenue and expense figures. It also clearly delineates management’s intended framework for interpreting these numbers through the MD&A’s structured sections. However, the absence of quantitative forensic scores — such as the Beneish M-Score, Altman Z″, Piotroski F-Score, and Fog Index — means this reading cannot offer an algorithmic assessment of earnings quality, financial distress, fundamental strength, or the textual complexity of its disclosures. While the document presents specific financial data and management’s narrative, it does not, on its own, provide the tools to evaluate the underlying accounting choices or the broader risk profile through these established forensic lenses.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Apr 21, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-21)### Item 2.02 hereof) . 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded in the Inline XBRL document). SIGNATURE Pursuant to the req0
    Read →
  • Apr 21, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Mar 25, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-12)0
    Read →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-03)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 3, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about MMM's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →