Meta Platforms, Inc.

META Communication Services · Internet Content & Information
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$736.72
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$520.26 — $779.82
-6% from high
Market cap
1.9T
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.3%
P/E
27.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Revenue up 22%, but net income fell as long-term debt more than doubled.

Bullish Beneish: -3.06Altman Z″: 5.34Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 19.6
RED DEEP 77 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-3.06
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
5.34
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
19.55
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Filing.fyi's forensic screens give a mixed but mostly reassuring picture, and the important tensions sit in the filing text. The Beneish M-Score is -3.057, which is below -1.78 and not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone; an elevated reading would be a screening flag calling for a closer read, and this score does not trigger that flag. The Altman Z″-Score is 5.34, in the safe zone, which describes balance-sheet strength on this model rather than predicting near-term results. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 7 computable signals, a middling reading that points to mixed year-over-year improvement across the signals that could be computed. The Fog Index is 19.55, which the label classifies as very hard to read, so readers may want to look at the MD&A sections on constant currency revenue and free cash flow slowly. Operating cash flow of $115.8 billion was 1.92 times net income of $60.46 billion. Subtracting capital expenditures, including finance lease principal payments, of $72.22 billion leaves roughly $43.6 billion, a simple calculation from the provided figures. Readers may also want to look at the Limitations of Key Metrics section, which states that the error margin for Family metrics is generally about 3% of worldwide daily active people and that machine learning models and user surveys drive those estimates. Reality Labs, with a $19.19 billion operating loss, is a segment readers may want to track alongside its $2.21 billion revenue. The filing also reports $26.26 billion in share repurchases and $5.32 billion in dividend payments during 2025, which were funded while debt and liabilities were increasing.

Catalyst.According to the 2025 10-K MD&A, total revenue rose 22% to $200.97 billion, driven mainly by advertising. Ad impressions rose 12% year over year and average price per ad rose 9%. Family of Apps revenue was $198.76 billion, while Reality Labs revenue was $2.21 billion with an operating loss of $19.19 billion. Management says AI-driven ad delivery and Reels are contributing, though the filing notes Reels monetizes at a lower rate than Feed and Stories. Operating income rose 20% to $83.28 billion, with costs up on employee compensation and infrastructure. Family daily active people averaged 3.58 billion in December 2025, up 7%.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is between strong operating cash flow and a net income line that declined while borrowing rose. Net income fell from $62.36 billion in 2024 to $60.46 billion in 2025, even though operating income rose 20%. The 2025 effective tax rate was 30%, which includes a valuation allowance charge tied to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act; the filing says the rate would have been 13% without that charge. Long-term debt rose from $28.83 billion to $58.74 billion, and total liabilities rose from $93.42 billion to $148.78 billion. The filing also says privacy regulation and Apple and Google platform changes reduce ad targeting, which it expects to keep weighing on advertising revenue.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what META reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.5%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
33.6M
Change since Aug 31
+16.5%
Days to cover
1.4

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against META. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 16.5% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Meta Platforms filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Jul 29, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-08)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-28)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-12)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 19, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-12-19)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 30, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 17, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2024-12-31)0
    EDGAR →
Recent material news

What the desk read this week

Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →