Microchip Technology Incorporated

MCHP Technology · Semiconductors
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$74.26
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$48.52 — $105.91
-30% from high
Market cap
40.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.5%
P/E
109.2
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for MCHP yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

This synthesis rests on a narrow data set, and that limit matters for how the numbers should be read. The only financial figures on file are annual revenues from fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2025. Revenue rose from $3.98 billion in fiscal 2018 to $8.44 billion in fiscal 2023, then declined to $7.63 billion in fiscal 2024 and $4.4 billion in fiscal 2025. Those figures show a business whose top line expanded substantially over five years and then contracted sharply in the two most recent fiscal years. What the data cannot show is why. No MD&A text is on file, so management's own explanation of segment performance, product demand, pricing, or customer inventory is absent. No risk-factor text is on file, so the company's disclosed legal matters, debt instruments, export or trade regulations, and other exposures cannot be reviewed here. No FACT-classified news headlines are on file either, so no external reporting is included. On the forensic side, no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index is available in this data, so this synthesis does not assign any value or label to those screens. Readers who want to test the revenue trend may want to look at the company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K, particularly the MD&A and risk factor sections, along with the balance sheet and cash flow statement, to see whether margins, receivables, inventory, and cash generation moved in line with the top-line decline. The filings themselves are the primary source for those answers.

Catalyst.The annual revenue figures on file show a sharp reset. Revenues were $8.44 billion in fiscal 2023, $7.63 billion in fiscal 2024, and $4.4 billion in fiscal 2025, a decline of about 42% in the latest year and about 48% from the fiscal 2023 level. The MD&A text that would explain what is driving this change is not in the data available for this synthesis, so the cause of the decline cannot be attributed from these records.

Hidden risk.The most important tension a casual reader could miss is that revenue is the only financial line on file, and it has fallen in two consecutive years. Revenue dropped about 10% in fiscal 2024 and about 42% in fiscal 2025, a much faster pace than the growth seen from fiscal 2018 ($3.98 billion) to fiscal 2023 ($8.44 billion). No risk-factor text is on file to explain whether this reflects demand, pricing, inventory, or company-specific issues, and no balance sheet or cash flow data is included to test how the revenue trend affected the rest of the business.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what MCHP reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
8.2%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
33.3M
Change since Aug 31
+1.6%
Days to cover
4.0

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that MCHP shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+1.6%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.0 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Microchip Technology filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 19, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →