lululemon athletica inc.
LULU Consumer Cyclical · Apparel RetailNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for LULU yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
The filing shows a company growing its top line while its largest market and its margins weaken. Consolidated net revenue rose about 5%, but the Americas segment, which produced 71% of net revenue at $7.85 billion, declined 1.0%, and comparable sales there fell 3%. Management attributes the Americas weakness to lower conversion, store traffic, and average order value, along with a 340 basis point drop in Americas product margin that it ties to tariffs and increased markdowns. Sales per square foot fell to $1,426 from $1,574, a decline of about 9.4%, even as the store count rose. Management says mitigating actions, including selective price increases and vendor negotiations, are not expected to fully offset tariff costs. The company repurchased 5.0 million shares for $1.2 billion during the year, and in December 2025 its board approved a $1.0 billion increase to the repurchase authorization, a capital allocation choice readers may want to weigh against the margin outlook. Regulatory context also matters: the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated IEEPA tariffs on February 20, 2026, new tariffs were initiated under other legal authorities, and the statutory de minimis exemption is set to be repealed by July 1, 2027. No forensic scores are on file for this synthesis, so no score-based conclusions are drawn here. Readers may want to look at the balance sheet and cash flow statement in the 10-K to judge earnings quality directly.
Catalyst.According to the MD&A, growth in the year ended February 1, 2026 (the company's fiscal 2025) came mainly from outside the Americas. Net revenue rose 5% to $11.1 billion. China Mainland revenue increased 28.9% to $1.75 billion, with comparable sales up 20%, which management ties partly to 21 net new stores there. Rest of World revenue rose 15.6% to $1.50 billion. Americas revenue fell 1.0% to $7.85 billion, and Americas comparable sales declined 3%. Management's action plan rests on three pillars (product creation, product activation, and enterprise efficiency) aimed at restoring North American growth. Company-operated stores grew to 811 from 767.
Hidden risk.The most material tension is between revenue growth and profit. Income from operations fell 12% to $2.2 billion, operating margin dropped 380 basis points to 19.9%, and diluted earnings per share fell to $13.26 from $14.64. Management attributes much of this to U.S. tariffs and the removal of the de minimis exemption, which reduced gross profit by approximately $275 million, and it says it expects continued declines in gross and operating margin in 2026. The company also remitted $216 million of IEEPA tariffs, but says the amount it may recover remains uncertain. Readers may want to look at the Risk Factors and the tariff discussion for how these items are described.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 15.4M
- Change since Aug 31
- +14.2%
- Days to cover
- 1.9
What it tells us
A large group of traders is betting that LULU shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.
Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 14.2% since the Aug 31 report.
At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) lululemon athletica filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Oct 7, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)EDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Sep 14, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.03: Charter or bylaw change; fiscal-year changeEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Sep 3, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Sep 3, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Aug 13, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 8.01: Other events0EDGAR →
- Apr 28, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-26)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Apr 22, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-21)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Mar 17, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-03-17)No specific items found in 8-K.0EDGAR →
- Mar 17, 202610-KAnnual report (2026-02-01)Period: 2026-02-010EDGAR →
- Dec 11, 202510-QQuarterly report (2025-11-02)Period: 2025-11-020EDGAR →
- Apr 29, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-06-11)0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →