Linde plc

LIN Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$511.06
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$387.78 — $527.94
-3% from high
Market cap
236.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
123.0%
P/E
33.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Deep value.

Deep Value (Bullish) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Bullish Beneish: -2.68Altman Z″: 4.31
RED DEEP 100 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.68
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
4.31
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Linde plc’s 2025 10-K offers a structured approach to its financial disclosures, with Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, explicitly stating the discussion “should be read together with its consolidated financial statements” from Item 8. This comprehensive framework guides the reader through specific sections, beginning with a “Business Overview” that details the company’s primary products in its industrial gases business: atmospheric gases such as oxygen, nitrogen, and argon, alongside process gases including hydrogen, helium, and carbon dioxide. The MD&A then proceeds to an “Executive Summary – Financial Results & Outlook,” “Consolidated Results and Other Information,” and a “Segment Discussion.” Further sections cover “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Other Financial Data,” “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements,” and “Critical Accounting Estimates,” indicating a thorough presentation of the company’s financial position and operational results. This organized structure aims to facilitate a detailed understanding of Linde’s complex global operations.

The forensic scores for Linde plc paint a picture of financial resilience, suggesting a company with robust accounting practices. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector registered a score of -2.6842, which is well below the -1.78 threshold indicating elevated manipulation risk. This metric assesses the likelihood of a company manipulating its reported earnings based on changes in specific financial ratios. Similarly, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — came in at 4.31, comfortably within the “safe” zone, which is defined as scores above 2.60. This index combines five financial ratios to predict the probability of a company entering bankruptcy. Both metrics, while not exhaustive, suggest a low probability of near-term financial distress based on their respective models. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, and the Fog Index, a readability score, were not available for this filing.

Item 1A, Risk Factors, highlights the potential impact of “weakening economic conditions in markets in which Linde does business” on its financial results and cash flows. The company acknowledges that a broad decline in general economic or business conditions within the industries served by its customers could adversely affect demand for its products and impair customer payment abilities. However, Linde explicitly mitigates this concern by noting its extensive operations span “a diverse group of industries across more than 80 countries,” which it believes “generally leads to financial stability through various business cycles.” This geographic and industrial diversification is a key factor in managing macroeconomic volatility, aiming to buffer demand fluctuations that might otherwise impair customer ability to satisfy obligations or reduce product demand for its atmospheric and process gases. The explicit acknowledgment of both the risk and its inherent mitigation strategy provides useful context for understanding the company’s operational resilience.

This filing provides a comprehensive snapshot of Linde’s financial health through robust forensic scores and management’s candid discussion of risks and mitigating factors. It offers detailed insights into the company’s operational structure, its primary product lines, and its transparent approach to financial reporting, as evidenced by the structured MD&A. What the filing cannot convey, however, is a definitive verdict on the security’s market valuation or its future price trajectory. A comprehensive assessment of whether LIN is mispriced would require an independent analysis of broader market dynamics, specific industry trends within specialty chemicals and industrial gases, and a forward-looking view on global economic conditions beyond the scope of this document. The filing informs, but does not predict. Read the 10-K. Decide for yourself.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-05)### Item 2.02 hereof: Exhibit No . Description 99.1 Press Release dated February 5, 2026 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL d0
    Read →
  • Dec 3, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-12-03)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Nov 20, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-11-20)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Oct 31, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    Read →
  • Apr 30, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-07-29)0
    Read →
  • Feb 26, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2024-12-31)Period: 2024-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about LIN's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →