Leidos Holdings, Inc.

LDOS Technology · Information Technology Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$124.00
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$98.86 — $205.77
-40% from high
Market cap
15.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.4%
P/E
11.6
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for LDOS yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

This synthesis rests on a narrow data set: reported revenues and operating income for selected fiscal years. The filings provided contain no MD&A narrative, no risk-factor text, no FACT-classified news, and no forensic scores. As a result, this analysis cannot test management's explanations against the numbers, and it cannot name specific segments, programs, contracts, legal matters, or debt instruments. Because no forensic scores are on file, none are reported here. For readers learning the framework, the Beneish M-Score is a statistical screen for patterns sometimes associated with earnings manipulation, and an elevated reading is a prompt for closer review rather than proof of wrongdoing. The Piotroski F-Score counts a set of profitability, leverage, and efficiency signals to gauge financial strength. The Altman Z-Score uses a zone system to estimate financial distress risk and is designed for non-financial firms. The Fog Index estimates how hard a passage is to read. Within the numbers provided, the business has grown. Revenues rose about 25.6% from $13.62 billion in the 2021-FY to $17.11 billion in the 2026-FY, and operating margin in the 2026-FY of about 12.3% is the highest of the years shown. The 2023-FY dip is the main item a careful reader should trace in the original filing. Readers may want to look at the MD&A and risk-factor sections of the most recent annual report and check whether the 2023 operating income decline was explained by one-time or program-level items.

Catalyst.The filings provided do not include MD&A text, so the business drivers cannot be attributed to management's own explanation. The reported figures show revenues rising from $16.58 billion in the 2025-FY to $17.11 billion in the 2026-FY, a year-over-year increase of about 3.2%. Operating income rose from $1.83 billion to $2.11 billion over the same period, about 15.3% higher. Operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by revenues, moved from about 11.0% to about 12.3%. Over the longer span shown, revenues grew from $13.62 billion in the 2021-FY to $17.11 billion in the 2026-FY. Readers may want to look at the MD&A in the original annual report to see what management credits for these changes.

Hidden risk.The most visible tension in the data is the volatility of operating income. Operating income fell to $621 million in the 2023-FY, down from $1.09 billion in the 2022-FY, a decline of about 43%. Operating margin dropped to about 4.0% that year, compared with about 7.6% in the 2022-FY. Revenues rose to $15.34 billion in the 2023-FY, so costs must have grown faster than sales for operating income to fall. The data does not explain the cause, and no risk-factor text is on file to confirm it. A recovery in later years does not remove the fact that a margin swing of this size in a single year is material.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what LDOS reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.4%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
4.8M
Change since Aug 31
+32.0%
Days to cover
3.7

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against LDOS. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 32.0% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.7 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Leidos filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →