Lucid Group, Inc.

LCID Consumer Cyclical · Auto Manufacturers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$3.50
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$2.37 — $20.61
-83% from high
Market cap
1.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
—
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Red flags.

Lucid's 2024 revenue rose 35.7%, but losses, cash burn and an elevated Beneish flag persist.

Bearish Beneish: -1.13Altman Z″: -3.04Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 23.6
RED DEEP 22 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-1.13
High manipulation likelihood
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
-3.04
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
23.59
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the numbers show a company with growing sales but still deep losses and cash outflows. In 2024 the company reported $807.83 million of revenue, an operating loss of $3.02 billion, a net loss of $2.71 billion, and operating cash flow of negative $2.02 billion. Operating cash flow divided by net income is 0.74, meaning the cash outflow was smaller than the accounting loss, but the excerpts provided do not explain the gap, so readers may want to look at the cash flow statement directly. The accumulated deficit was $14.8 billion as of September 30, 2025, and the risk factors say the company will require additional capital that may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. The four forensic scores point in the same cautious direction. The Beneish M-Score of -1.131 falls in the elevated manipulation-risk zone, above the -1.78 threshold; this is a screening flag that points to accounting items worth a closer read, not evidence of manipulation. The Altman Z-Score of -3.04 (the Z-double-prime variant) is in the distress zone, meaning the model's measures of financial strength are weak for a company of this size. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 7 computable signals, meaning four of the seven checks that could be computed were met. The Fog Index of 23.59 is in the very hard to read band, so the MD&A is dense and takes patience to follow. The filings name specific items worth tracking: the 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026, the 5.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030, the Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and the planned AMP-2 facility in Saudi Arabia. Readers may want to look at how these obligations are settled and how the company plans to fund its losses, because the risk factors state that settling the preferred stock may dilute common stockholders.

Catalyst.Revenue is the main positive in the data: $807.83 million for 2024, up 35.7% from $595.27 million in 2023, after $608.18 million in 2022. The 10-Q MD&A ties near-term activity to a small set of programs: the Lucid Air, the Lucid Gravity, an upcoming Midsize platform, and the Casa Grande AMP-1 plant, with a planned AMP-2 facility in Saudi Arabia. Management also names agreements with Aston Martin, Uber and Nuro as sources of anticipated benefits, but those benefits are described as expected rather than shown in reported results. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the company reported a net loss of $1,884.0 million.

Hidden risk.The filings concentrate risk in several places a casual reader could skim past. The risk factors state that Lucid depends primarily on a limited number of models, relies on suppliers that are mostly single-source, and has limited experience in high-volume manufacturing. Total equity fell from $4.85 billion at the end of 2023 to $3.87 billion at the end of 2024, while long-term debt was $2 billion in both years. Control is also concentrated: the PIF and Ayar hold significant influence, and the company describes itself as a controlled company. The Beneish score sits in the elevated zone, which is a screening flag calling for a closer read of the accounting lines, not proof of manipulation.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what LCID reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
57.2%
of the shares available to trade
Very high
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
94.4M
Change since Aug 31
+24.8%
Days to cover
8.5

What it tells us

Bets against LCID are unusually crowded. If the price rises, short sellers racing to buy shares back can push it higher still. That is called a short squeeze.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 24.8% since the Aug 31 report.

Short sellers would need about 8.5 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Lucid Group filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation; Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-14)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-14)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events; Item 3.02: Unregistered sale of shares; Item 3.03: Change to shareholder rights; Item 7.010
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-09)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-20)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-05)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →