The Kroger Co.

KR Consumer Defensive · Grocery Stores
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$62.71
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$54.15 — $76.58
-18% from high
Market cap
37B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.5%
P/E
34.8
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for KR yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Filing.fyi holds only annual income-statement lines for Kroger for fiscal years 2019 through 2026, so this synthesis is limited to those figures. Revenue has been large and fairly stable, ranging from $121.16 billion in fiscal 2019 to $150.04 billion in fiscal 2024, and reached $147.64 billion in fiscal 2026. Profit has been far less steady. Operating income peaked at $4.13 billion in fiscal 2023 and was $1.89 billion in fiscal 2026, while net income was $3.11 billion in fiscal 2019 and $1.02 billion in fiscal 2026. Readers can verify these numbers against the company's income statement. No forensic scores are on file for this company, so the file contains no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index value, and this synthesis does not state one. The Beneish M-Score screens for possible earnings manipulation, the Piotroski F-Score counts simple financial-health signals, the Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk, and the Fog Index measures how hard text is to read. The absence of these scores here is not a clean result; each would need to be checked separately. The narrative side is also missing. With no MD&A, risk-factor, or classified news text on file, this analysis cannot test whether management's explanation for the fiscal 2026 profit decline matches the numbers. Readers may want to look at the MD&A section of the most recent annual report, where changes in operating income are usually discussed, and at the risk-factor section. Together, those would show whether the drop in operating income from $3.85 billion to $1.89 billion reflects identified cost pressures, one-time items, or something else.

Catalyst.The data provided for Kroger does not include MD&A text, so this paragraph cannot describe what management attributes results to. The reported figures show the direction of change. Revenues were $147.64 billion for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2026, compared with $147.12 billion the prior year, a gain of about 0.4%. Over the same comparison, operating income fell to $1.89 billion from $3.85 billion, and net income fell to $1.02 billion from $2.67 billion. Sales were broadly steady while earnings contracted sharply. The change appears to sit in costs or margins rather than top-line growth, but the data here does not explain the cause.

Hidden risk.The most visible tension is that a flat revenue line coexists with much weaker profit. Operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by revenues, moved from about 2.6% in fiscal 2025 to about 1.3% in fiscal 2026. Net margin moved from about 1.8% to about 0.7%. Operating income was $4.13 billion at its fiscal 2023 high in this dataset, so the fiscal 2026 level is well below that peak. Because no risk-factor text is on file, a reader cannot see which pressures management itself flags as material. Readers may want to check the risk-factor section of Kroger's annual report directly.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what KR reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
5.3%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
31.4M
Change since Aug 31
+9.7%
Days to cover
3.8

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that KR shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+9.7%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.8 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) The Kroger filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 18, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 11, 2026
    8-K/A
    Current report (amended)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →