KeyCorp
KEY Financial Services · Banks - RegionalFairly valued.
Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
What the filing actually says.
KeyCorp’s most recent 10-Q filing, as excerpted, presents a structural roadmap for the reader rather than a direct dive into financial condition or operational results. The provided section, ostensibly from Item 1A (Risk Factors), instead details a table of contents for other items, including Item 2. This Item 2, Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations Introduction, indicates where the substantive discussion begins, noting it “reviews the financial condition and results of operations” for the periods ended March 31, 2026, and March 31, 2025.
The usual suite of forensic indicators, which often provide an initial quantitative signal, are not available for this reading. This includes Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, and Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan. Similarly, the Fog Index — a readability score where 12 equals a newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscation — is also not available. The absence of these scores means the analysis must rely solely on the textual content provided, which in this instance is limited to structural cues.
The excerpt from Item 1A, typically the home for specific risk factors, instead lists sub-items such as “Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” and “Item 5. Other Information.” This directs the reader to other sections of the 10-Q for actual content. The introductory language for Item 2 further advises readers to “refer to the consolidated financial statements and related notes in this report,” underscoring that the provided text is a navigational aid, not the detailed financial narrative itself.
Without the substantive content of the MD&A or the quantitative signals from forensic scores, this reading cannot speak to specific financial performance, operational risks, or the clarity of KeyCorp’s disclosures. It can only describe the filing’s presentation as a guide to its own contents. Whether the security is mispriced remains a question for those who delve into the full filing’s financial statements and the detailed discussion of results and risks that the introductory sections point toward.
Filing timeline
- May 5, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310Read →
- Apr 16, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-04-16)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On April 16, 2026, KeyCorp issued a press release announcing its financial results for the three-0Read →
- Mar 27, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-05-14)0Read →
- Mar 2, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-24)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0Read →
- Feb 23, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310Read →
- Feb 9, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-09)### Item 7.01 Registration FD Disclosure . KeyCorp will review its performance, strategy, and outlook at the UBS Financial Services Conference on Monday, Februa0Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →