J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

JBHT Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$235.31
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$157.82 — $299.76
-22% from high
Market cap
22.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.8%
P/E
33.2
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for JBHT yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The data supplied for J.B. Hunt Transport Services supports a narrow conclusion: reported profit has moved over a wide range across the annual figures provided, and the most recent year shows a modest rebound. Operating income was $865.07 million in 2025 compared with $831.23 million in 2024, an increase of about 4.1%. Net income was $598.28 million in 2025 compared with $570.89 million in 2024, about 4.8% higher. Both measures remain well below the 2022 operating income of $1.33 billion and the 2022 net income of $969.35 million, so the 2025 gain does not restore earlier levels. As a simple ratio of the provided values, net income was about 69% of operating income in both 2025 and 2024, compared with about 73% in 2023. A reader can check that ratio against the income statement. On forensic screening, this dataset contains no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index. None is reported here, and no value should be inferred from this page. The Beneish M-Score is a screen that compares several year-over-year ratios to flag possible earnings manipulation, the Piotroski F-Score counts a set of profitability, leverage, and efficiency signals, the Altman Z-Score is a distress indicator built from balance sheet and earnings ratios, and the Fog Index estimates how hard a passage is to read. Without these computed scores, this synthesis cannot offer a screening view on manipulation risk, financial distress, or readability. The revenue series in this dataset ends with fiscal 2017, so the top line cannot be compared with the 2025 results. Management's explanation of the 2024 decline, the risk-factor disclosures, and any news coverage are also absent. Readers may want to look at the MD&A and Item 1A risk factors in the company's most recent annual report on EDGAR to see what management attributes the recent swings to, and to pair those statements with the income statement figures above.

Catalyst.The supplied data gives no MD&A text, so this synthesis cannot state what management identifies as driving the business. The reported figures show a modest rebound in 2025. Operating income was $865.07 million for 2025, up from $831.23 million for 2024, an increase of about 4.1%. Net income was $598.28 million for 2025, compared with $570.89 million for 2024, about 4.8% higher. Both years remain below 2023 levels: operating income was $993.2 million and net income was $728.29 million in 2023. The 2025 increase is the only year-over-year gain in the recent annual series, and the filings supplied here do not explain its cause.

Hidden risk.The most visible tension is volatility rather than the latest gain. Net income fell from $969.35 million in 2022 to $728.29 million in 2023 and then to $570.89 million in 2024, a 21.6% drop in 2024 alone. Operating income fell about 16.3% in 2024 from $993.2 million. Because no MD&A or risk-factor text is on file, the reasons for these declines cannot be read from this data. A casual reader could treat the 2025 rebound as a trend, but it is one up year after two down years. The revenue series that would show whether the declines came from volume, pricing, or costs ends with 2017, so this gap cannot be closed from the supplied data.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what JBHT reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
5.1%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
3.2M
Change since Aug 31
+25.2%
Days to cover
2.6

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that JBHT shares will fall.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 25.2% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.6 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) J.B. Hunt Transport Services filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 24, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →