Illinois Tool Works Inc.
ITW Industrials · Specialty Industrial MachineryNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for ITW yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
This synthesis is limited by the data provided. No forensic scores are on file for Illinois Tool Works, so no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index value is reported here, and none should be inferred from the figures below. The Beneish M-Score is a screening model that estimates the likelihood of earnings manipulation from changes in receivables, margins, asset quality, and other line items; the Piotroski F-Score counts a set of profitability, leverage, and efficiency checks; the Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk; and the Fog Index measures how hard a document is to read. Each would need its own computed label before any reading could be made. What the filings data does show is a long-run pattern in the income statement. Revenue fell from $14.11 billion in 2019-FY to $12.57 billion in 2020-FY, then recovered to $16.04 billion by 2025-FY, while operating income rose from $2.88 billion in 2020-FY to a peak of $4.26 billion in 2024-FY before edging down to $4.22 billion. Operating margin rose from about 22.9% in 2020-FY to about 26.8% in 2024-FY, which is a meaningful improvement over the period. The 2025-FY result is therefore a pause after several years of gains rather than a sharp reversal. Readers may want to look at the risk factors and MD&A in the company's annual report to see how management describes the margin change and the outlook for its segments and end markets, and to check the balance sheet and cash flow statements for debt levels and cash generation, which are not included in this file.
Catalyst.The provided data does not include MD&A text, so this synthesis cannot attribute any business driver to management's own explanation. The reported figures show revenue of $16.04 billion for 2025-FY, up about 0.9% from $15.9 billion in 2024-FY, though still below the $16.11 billion reported for 2023-FY. Operating income was $4.22 billion in 2025-FY, down from $4.26 billion in 2024-FY, a decline of about 0.9%. Readers may want to look at the MD&A section of the company's 2025 annual report for management's stated reasons behind these results.
Hidden risk.The most visible tension in these numbers is that operating income fell while revenue rose. Operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by revenue, moved from about 26.8% in 2024-FY to about 26.3% in 2025-FY. That margin had widened steadily from about 22.9% in 2020-FY, so the 2025 step-down is small but reverses the recent direction. Without risk-factor text, balance sheet, or cash flow data in this file, the cause of the margin shift cannot be determined from what is provided.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 9.2M
- Change since Aug 31
- +4.9%
- Days to cover
- 6.7
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against ITW. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+4.9%).
Short sellers would need about 6.7 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
SEC filings
The current report (8-K) Illinois Tool Works filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Jul 28, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →