Illinois Tool Works Inc.

ITW Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$267.47
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$238.82 — $303.16
-12% from high
Market cap
77B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
241.0%
P/E
24.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

The most recent SEC filing for Illinois Tool Works Inc., an Industrials sector company specializing in Specialty Industrial Machinery, presents a unique challenge for forensic analysis: the specific filing details, including its form type, filing date, and report period, are currently unknown. This foundational absence extends to the quantitative forensic scores, which are uniformly marked “not available.” A forensic reading typically commences with a specific document and its contained data, scrutinizing the numbers and narratives for anomalies. Here, the initial observation is the profound lack of such specifics, precluding any immediate granular assessment of the company’s reported financial condition or operational results, which is itself a noteworthy starting point for a review.

Without access to the underlying data, a comprehensive application of established forensic metrics is not possible for Illinois Tool Works Inc. The Beneish M-Score (Beneish, 1999), an eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, is “not available,” preventing an assessment against its >-1.78 threshold for elevated risk, which typically flags companies where revenue growth outpaces cash collection or where asset quality might be deteriorating. Similarly, Altman’s Z″ (Altman, 1968), a bankruptcy-distress index, remains uncalculated, leaving its <1.10 (distress), 1.10–2.60 (grey), and >2.60 (safe) ranges unaddressed, thus offering no insight into the company’s solvency profile. The Piotroski F-Score (Piotroski, 2000), a 9-point fundamental strength scan, is also “not available,” precluding an evaluation of its operational efficiency, profitability, and leverage trends. Lastly, the Fog Index (Gunning, 1952), a readability score where ≥18 indicates obfuscatory prose, is “not available,” meaning the clarity of the filing itself cannot be assessed.

The absence of specific excerpts from Item 7 (MD&A) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) further limits the scope of this forensic reading. Item 7, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, is typically where management provides its narrative on the company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations. This section is crucial for forensic accountants as it offers qualitative insights into reported quantitative figures, explaining trends, uncertainties, and commitments. Item 1A, detailing Risk Factors, outlines material risks that could affect the company’s business, financial condition, or results, providing a forward-looking perspective on potential challenges. Without these sections, the reader lacks direct insight into management’s self-assessment, its strategic outlook, and the company’s identified vulnerabilities, which are essential components of a complete filing review.

This reading is inherently constrained by the “not available” status across all provided forensic metrics and filing excerpts for Illinois Tool Works Inc. Consequently, it offers no basis to assess potential earnings manipulation, bankruptcy distress, fundamental strength, or the readability of the company’s disclosures. While the company operates within the Industrials sector, specifically Specialty Industrial Machinery, the filing information provided does not permit an analysis of its specific operational or financial characteristics, nor does it allow for the identification of any red flags or areas of strength. A complete forensic accounting perspective requires the actual filing document to draw any conclusions regarding the company’s financial health, its disclosure practices, or the potential mispricing of its security.

Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about ITW's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →