Gartner, Inc.

IT Technology · Information Technology Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$132.79
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$124.25 — $409.76
-68% from high
Market cap
8.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
13.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Gartner’s 2026 10-Q presents a snapshot of quarterly financial movements, with the provided excerpts highlighting shifts in current assets. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $55.5 million, moving from $1,722,521 thousand at December 31, 2025, to $1,666,946 thousand at March 31, 2026. More notably, fees receivable, net of allowances—revenue earned but not yet collected—declined by $273 million, from $1,684,522 thousand to $1,411,496 thousand over the same period. Concurrently, deferred commissions also saw a reduction, decreasing from $400,728 thousand to $379,221 thousand. Furthermore, assets held-for-sale—assets expected to be sold within one year—were entirely removed from the balance sheet, moving from $106,361 thousand to zero. These specific changes in current assets offer the most immediate quantitative observations from the filing’s provided excerpts.

The standard suite of forensic accounting metrics, which often provides an early warning system for financial anomalies, is not available for this reading. This includes the Beneish M-Score—a 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector (Beneish, 1999)—which typically flags elevated manipulation risk above -1.78. Similarly absent is Altman’s Z″—a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index (Altman, 1968)—which categorizes companies into distress, grey, or safe zones. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), also lacks data, as does the Fog Index—a readability score (Gunning, 1952)—which measures textual obfuscation. Their absence means the filing’s quantitative readability and financial health signals remain unquantified by these established frameworks.

While the MD&A excerpt provides a generic introduction to its purpose, stating it conveys our expectations of the potential impact of known trends, events or uncertainties, the specific “Risk Factors” section provided in the filing’s excerpt is anchored by balance sheet data rather than qualitative disclosures. This section details changes like the $273 million reduction in fees receivable and the complete disposition of assets held-for-sale. Such movements, particularly the decrease in fees receivable, represent a reduction in uncollected revenue, which can stem from various operational factors. The shift of assets held-for-sale to zero indicates a completed transaction, removing a temporary asset classification and potentially impacting total current assets. The reduction in deferred commissions from $400,728 thousand to $379,221 thousand also reflects changes in revenue recognition or sales compensation. These specific financial movements, though presented under a “Risk Factors” heading in the prompt, are the most concrete details available for analysis.

This reading, constrained by the provided excerpts and the absence of forensic scores, offers a limited perspective on Gartner’s overall financial health or future trajectory. The filing can inform readers about specific quarterly shifts in current assets, such as the reduction in fees receivable and the resolution of assets held-for-sale. However, without access to the full 10-Q, particularly the complete MD&A and risk factors, it cannot provide insight into broader operational trends, management’s detailed strategic outlook, or the qualitative risks the company faces. The lack of quantitative forensic metrics further limits the ability to assess potential accounting anomalies or fundamental strength. Read the 10-Q. Decide for yourself.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 2.02 and in Exhibit 99 .1 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10
    Read →
  • Apr 15, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-28)0
    Read →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 3, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)### Item 2.02 and in Exhibit 99 .1 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 10
    Read →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about IT's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →