International Paper Company

IP Consumer Cyclical · Packaging & Containers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$38.23
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$29.26 — $56.13
-32% from high
Market cap
20.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
477.0%
P/E
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Watch.

Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Caution Beneish: -2.85Altman Z″: 0.57Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 49 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.85
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.57
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

International Paper Company’s recent 10-Q filing presents a curious juxtaposition: a significant increase in net sales alongside a forensic score indicating financial distress. Net Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026, rose to $5,971 million from $5,264 million in the prior year period. However, the Altman Z″ (Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index) registers at 0.57, placing the company firmly below the 1.10 threshold that signals elevated risk of financial failure. This specific metric suggests that while top-line growth is evident, underlying financial ratios point to considerable structural pressures.

The forensic scores offer a more granular view of these pressures. The Beneish M-Score (−2.8504), Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, is well below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting no elevated risk of earnings manipulation. In contrast, the Altman Z″ of 0.57, as noted, falls into the “distress” zone, indicating a heightened probability of bankruptcy within two years. The Piotroski F-Score (Piotroski’s 9-point fundamental strength scan) sits at 4.0 out of 9, which is neither strong (7+) nor weak (<4), placing it squarely in the middle, offering a mixed signal on fundamental health.

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section, as is customary, prefaces its content with a warning that the discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs that involve significant risks and uncertainties. It further clarifies that “Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.” This standard disclosure is particularly salient when viewed against the Altman Z″ score, underscoring the inherent volatility and potential divergence between management’s outlook and future financial outcomes. The filing also explicitly directs readers to review the information “in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes” and the Company’s Annual Report.

This filing, while providing a snapshot of the company’s financial position and recent operational results, does not offer a complete picture for investment decisions. It highlights an increase in net sales but also flags a significant level of financial distress via the Altman Z″. What it cannot tell us is the market’s current valuation of these risks, the efficacy of future strategic initiatives, or the broader macroeconomic conditions that might influence the packaging sector. The absence of a Fog Index also means the readability of the document itself cannot be quantitatively assessed. Read the 10-Q. Decide for yourself.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 2.02 and General Instruction B .2 thereunder. Such information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of0
    Read →
  • Mar 27, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    Read →
  • Feb 27, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-26)### Item 7.01 of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange0
    Read →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)### Item 2.02 and General Instruction B .2 thereunder. Such information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about IP's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →