International Paper Company
IP Consumer Cyclical · Packaging & ContainersFairly valued.
International Paper's 2025 revenue jumped 26.9% but it posted a $3.52 billion net loss.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The forensic scores give a mixed but not alarming picture. The Beneish M-Score for 2025 is -2.850, which is below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. In plain terms, that score is a statistical screen built from several year-over-year ratios; a result below the threshold means the screen did not flag the 2025 numbers, but it is not proof that the reported figures are accurate, and a closer read of the filings is still worthwhile. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 8 computable signals, which means roughly half of the profitability, leverage and efficiency tests that could be computed were favorable. That is a middling reading, consistent with a year that combined a large revenue increase with a net loss. The filings also show a governance point readers may want to examine. The 10-K's UK Listing Rules table reports that 30% of the Board are women, below the 40% standard, and that the senior Board positions of Chair, CEO, CFO and Lead Director are all held by men, so the company says it does not currently meet that standard. Its talent risk factor describes efforts to attract and retain key management, which matters during a planned separation. The first-quarter 2026 MD&A also lists specific operating items to follow: the Savannah, Georgia mill shutdown, the paper machine 26 conversion at the Riverdale mill in Selma, Alabama, which management expects to drive peak maintenance outage spending in the second quarter, and the sale of the Global Cellulose Fibers business. Taken together, the filings show a company whose reported income fell sharply in 2025, whose debt rose, and whose management narrative emphasizes cost savings and spending. The numbers support reading that narrative carefully rather than accepting it at face value.
Catalyst.The first-quarter 2026 10-Q, filed May 5, 2026, centers on cost discipline and portfolio changes. Net sales were $5.97 billion, earnings from continuing operations were $76 million, and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $677 million, a non-GAAP measure. Management says North America box shipments ran about 3% above industry demand, the third straight quarter of outpacing industry growth. The company received $1.1 billion of net proceeds from selling its Global Cellulose Fibers business and used part of it to repay $660 million of debt. Pending moves include a $360 million acquisition of NORPAC and a $225 million sustainable packaging plant in Rankin County, Mississippi, plus a planned EMEA packaging spinoff expected within 12 to 15 months.
Hidden risk.The 2025 10-K shows a net loss of $3.52 billion, compared with net income of $557 million in 2024, even though revenue rose 26.9% to $23.63 billion. Operating cash flow was $1.7 billion, so the ratio of operating cash flow to net income is -0.48; the negative figure reflects the loss, not negative cash generation. Long-term debt climbed from $5.37 billion to $8.84 billion during 2025, and total assets rose from $22.8 billion to $37.96 billion. The Q1 2026 filing refers to legacy DS Smith assets in both regions, so readers may want to check the 10-K for what drove the loss and the balance sheet change. Management also flags freight and diesel costs as near-term pressure, with price recovery lagging.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 44.9M
- Change since Aug 31
- +0.1%
- Days to cover
- 8.4
What it tells us
A large group of traders is betting that IP shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+0.1%).
Short sellers would need about 8.4 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) International Paper Company filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Oct 8, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 9.01: Financial Statements and Exhibits0EDGAR →
- Aug 5, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Jul 30, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Jul 17, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directorsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- May 5, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310EDGAR →
- Apr 30, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Mar 27, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-12-31)0EDGAR →
- Feb 27, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-26)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Jan 29, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-01-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →