International Paper Company
IP Consumer Cyclical · Packaging & ContainersWatch.
Watch (Caution) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
International Paper Company’s recent 10-Q filing presents a curious juxtaposition: a significant increase in net sales alongside a forensic score indicating financial distress. Net Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026, rose to $5,971 million from $5,264 million in the prior year period. However, the Altman Z″ (Altman’s 1968 bankruptcy-distress index) registers at 0.57, placing the company firmly below the 1.10 threshold that signals elevated risk of financial failure. This specific metric suggests that while top-line growth is evident, underlying financial ratios point to considerable structural pressures.
The forensic scores offer a more granular view of these pressures. The Beneish M-Score (−2.8504), Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, is well below the -1.78 threshold, suggesting no elevated risk of earnings manipulation. In contrast, the Altman Z″ of 0.57, as noted, falls into the “distress” zone, indicating a heightened probability of bankruptcy within two years. The Piotroski F-Score (Piotroski’s 9-point fundamental strength scan) sits at 4.0 out of 9, which is neither strong (7+) nor weak (<4), placing it squarely in the middle, offering a mixed signal on fundamental health.
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section, as is customary, prefaces its content with a warning that the discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs that involve significant risks and uncertainties. It further clarifies that “Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.” This standard disclosure is particularly salient when viewed against the Altman Z″ score, underscoring the inherent volatility and potential divergence between management’s outlook and future financial outcomes. The filing also explicitly directs readers to review the information “in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes” and the Company’s Annual Report.
This filing, while providing a snapshot of the company’s financial position and recent operational results, does not offer a complete picture for investment decisions. It highlights an increase in net sales but also flags a significant level of financial distress via the Altman Z″. What it cannot tell us is the market’s current valuation of these risks, the efficacy of future strategic initiatives, or the broader macroeconomic conditions that might influence the packaging sector. The absence of a Fog Index also means the readability of the document itself cannot be quantitatively assessed. Read the 10-Q. Decide for yourself.
Filing timeline
- May 5, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310Read →
- Apr 30, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-04-30)### Item 2.02 and General Instruction B .2 thereunder. Such information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of0Read →
- Mar 27, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-12-31)0Read →
- Feb 27, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310Read →
- Feb 26, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-02-26)### Item 7.01 of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange0Read →
- Jan 29, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-01-29)### Item 2.02 and General Instruction B .2 thereunder. Such information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of0Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →