International Paper Company

IP Consumer Cyclical · Packaging & Containers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$34.10
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$29.26 — $50.25
-32% from high
Market cap
18.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
5.4%
P/E
—
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

International Paper's 2025 revenue jumped 26.9% but it posted a $3.52 billion net loss.

Neutral Beneish: -2.85Piotroski: 4/9
RED DEEP 74 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.85
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The forensic scores give a mixed but not alarming picture. The Beneish M-Score for 2025 is -2.850, which is below the -1.78 threshold and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. In plain terms, that score is a statistical screen built from several year-over-year ratios; a result below the threshold means the screen did not flag the 2025 numbers, but it is not proof that the reported figures are accurate, and a closer read of the filings is still worthwhile. The Piotroski F-Score is 4 of 8 computable signals, which means roughly half of the profitability, leverage and efficiency tests that could be computed were favorable. That is a middling reading, consistent with a year that combined a large revenue increase with a net loss. The filings also show a governance point readers may want to examine. The 10-K's UK Listing Rules table reports that 30% of the Board are women, below the 40% standard, and that the senior Board positions of Chair, CEO, CFO and Lead Director are all held by men, so the company says it does not currently meet that standard. Its talent risk factor describes efforts to attract and retain key management, which matters during a planned separation. The first-quarter 2026 MD&A also lists specific operating items to follow: the Savannah, Georgia mill shutdown, the paper machine 26 conversion at the Riverdale mill in Selma, Alabama, which management expects to drive peak maintenance outage spending in the second quarter, and the sale of the Global Cellulose Fibers business. Taken together, the filings show a company whose reported income fell sharply in 2025, whose debt rose, and whose management narrative emphasizes cost savings and spending. The numbers support reading that narrative carefully rather than accepting it at face value.

Catalyst.The first-quarter 2026 10-Q, filed May 5, 2026, centers on cost discipline and portfolio changes. Net sales were $5.97 billion, earnings from continuing operations were $76 million, and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $677 million, a non-GAAP measure. Management says North America box shipments ran about 3% above industry demand, the third straight quarter of outpacing industry growth. The company received $1.1 billion of net proceeds from selling its Global Cellulose Fibers business and used part of it to repay $660 million of debt. Pending moves include a $360 million acquisition of NORPAC and a $225 million sustainable packaging plant in Rankin County, Mississippi, plus a planned EMEA packaging spinoff expected within 12 to 15 months.

Hidden risk.The 2025 10-K shows a net loss of $3.52 billion, compared with net income of $557 million in 2024, even though revenue rose 26.9% to $23.63 billion. Operating cash flow was $1.7 billion, so the ratio of operating cash flow to net income is -0.48; the negative figure reflects the loss, not negative cash generation. Long-term debt climbed from $5.37 billion to $8.84 billion during 2025, and total assets rose from $22.8 billion to $37.96 billion. The Q1 2026 filing refers to legacy DS Smith assets in both regions, so readers may want to check the 10-K for what drove the loss and the balance sheet change. Management also flags freight and diesel costs as near-term pressure, with price recovery lagging.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what IP reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
15.5%
of the shares available to trade
High
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
44.9M
Change since Aug 31
+0.1%
Days to cover
8.4

What it tells us

A large group of traders is betting that IP shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+0.1%).

Short sellers would need about 8.4 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) International Paper Company filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 9.01: Financial Statements and Exhibits0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 27, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 27, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-26)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →