The Hershey Company

HSY Consumer Defensive · Confectioners
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$181.58
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$160.07 — $239.48
-24% from high
Market cap
36.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
324.0%
P/E
33.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

The Hershey Company’s Q1 2026 10-Q presents a straightforward operational picture for the three months ended March 29, 2026. Net sales, the total revenue generated from product sales, increased to $3,104,167 thousand from $2,805,419 thousand in the prior year period. Cost of sales also increased, from $1,861,152 thousand to $1,881,436 thousand, but at a slower rate than sales. This translated to a notable improvement in gross profit, the revenue remaining after deducting cost of sales, which rose to $1,222,731 thousand from $944,267 thousand. Selling, marketing and administrative expense increased to $576,040 thousand from $558,672 thousand. Operating profit also saw a significant increase, reaching $640,693 thousand compared to $369,221 thousand previously. The company also reported a reduction in business realignment costs to $5,998 thousand from $16,374 thousand. The filing notes no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting estimates since the 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K, suggesting consistency in reporting methodologies.

The forensic accounting toolkit, unfortunately, remains largely in its box for this particular filing. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, designed to flag elevated manipulation risk, is marked “not available.” Similarly, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — and Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, are also absent. The Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory — is likewise not provided. This means the filing itself does not provide the quantitative signals these models typically offer to flag potential accounting anomalies, assess financial distress, evaluate fundamental strength, or measure textual complexity. The lack of these computed scores limits a key aspect of forensic analysis for this period, leaving readers without these specific data points.

Item 7, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, references the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This standard disclosure protecting companies from liability for forward-looking statements serves to note factors that could cause future results to differ materially. The company highlights its exposure to “changing economic, competitive, regulatory and technological risks and uncertainties.” While such language is a standard feature in SEC filings, its inclusion here underscores the inherent volatility in even established sectors. It reminds readers that, despite current operational improvements in net sales and gross profit, external factors always loom, and the forward-looking nature of financial projections inherently carries caveats. The MD&A also states no material changes to critical accounting estimates have occurred since December 31, 2025.

This Q1 2026 10-Q offers a snapshot of The Hershey Company’s recent operational performance, showing positive trends in key revenue and profit metrics. However, the absence of calculated forensic scores means this reading cannot provide the quantitative flags for earnings manipulation risk, financial distress, or fundamental strength that these models are designed to identify. It also cannot assess the readability of the document itself, which is typically illuminated by metrics like the Fog Index. Therefore, while the filing indicates a period of growth and consistent accounting estimates, it does not offer the specific forensic insights into accounting quality or textual complexity that a more comprehensive analysis, including these scores, would typically provide. The document’s structure, as outlined in Item 1A, focuses on financial statements without delving into specific risk factors beyond the general safe harbor statement.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-29)Period: 2026-03-290
    Read →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)### Item 2.02 of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99 .1, shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange0
    Read →
  • Apr 14, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-14)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 31, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-31)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 25, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-05)0
    Read →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about HSY's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →