Hormel Foods Corporation

HRL Consumer Defensive · Packaged Foods
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$20.19
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$18.96 — $26.60
-24% from high
Market cap
11.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
5.8%
P/E
32.6
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for HRL yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Forensic scores: none are on file for this company, so this synthesis assigns no value to the Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index. For readers learning these tools, the Beneish M-Score screens for patterns that sometimes accompany earnings manipulation and is a flag for closer reading rather than proof of manipulation; the Piotroski F-Score counts a set of profitability, leverage, and efficiency signals; the Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk; and the Fog Index estimates how hard a passage is to read. Without these scores, the assessment rests on the filing text and the reported figures. The reported figures describe a company with a large balance sheet and several market exposures. The 10-Q gives long-term fixed rate debt a fair value of $2.5 billion, where a 10 percent rise in interest rates would reduce that fair value by $56.5 million. Commodity hedges covering grain, lean hog, natural gas, and diesel had a fair value of $14.9 million, and a 10 percent drop in market prices would reduce the value of those cash flow contracts by $32.4 million. Net asset positions in foreign currencies were $0.8 billion, concentrated in the Chinese yuan, Indonesian rupiah, and Philippine peso, and the company does not use market risk sensitive instruments to manage that exposure. A rabbi trust carries $222.4 million of corporate-owned life insurance investments, and one customer accounted for more than 10 percent of net accounts receivable. The risk factors section states there have been no material changes from the 10-K. Readers may want to look at the revenue history, which in this data set runs only through fiscal 2017, so recent sales trends cannot be assessed from it. Readers may also want to look at Note K for legal matters, which the excerpt references but does not reproduce, and at the status of the Oracle implementation's internal controls in later fiscal 2026 filings.

Catalyst.The filings provided describe Transform and Modernize, a strategic initiative begun in the second half of fiscal 2023 with a goal of contributing meaningful operating profit growth through fiscal 2026, and a corporate restructuring plan commenced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 to reduce administrative expenses. Operating income was $718.6 million in fiscal 2025, down from $1.07 billion in fiscal 2024, a decline of roughly one-third on the reported figures. The Oracle Cloud order-to-cash implementation, begun during fiscal 2024 at certain locations, is expected to finish in fiscal 2026. The excerpt does not include a full results discussion, so the operational drivers behind the fiscal 2025 decline are not explained in the material provided.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is in asset values. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 Hormel recognized a $163.7 million impairment to reduce its Garudafood investment to estimated fair value, after concluding the decline was no longer temporary. The International reporting unit, carrying $258.9 million of goodwill, was identified as having only modest fair value above its carrying amount, and indefinite-lived intangible assets at heightened impairment risk totaled $683.3 million as of October 26, 2025. The Planters and Chi-Chi's trade names were impaired by $59.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The filings also note a fire at the Little Rock, Arkansas peanut butter production facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what HRL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
7.8%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
22.8M
Change since Aug 31
+9.9%
Days to cover
4.8

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that HRL shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+9.9%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.8 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Hormel Foods filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 27, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-01-25)Period: 2026-01-250
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-26)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 18, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-17)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-27)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 17, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-01-27)0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 5, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-10-26)Period: 2025-10-260
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →