Genuine Parts Company

GPC Consumer Cyclical · Auto Parts
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$117.18
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$90.78 — $151.57
-23% from high
Market cap
16.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
366.0%
P/E
266.3
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Genuine Parts Company’s most recent filing information, as provided, presents a unique challenge for forensic analysis: a fundamental lack of specific data points. Without a known form type, filing date, or report period, the very context for an SEC filing review is absent. Furthermore, the core quantitative and qualitative tools typically employed for a forensic reading—such as detailed financial metrics, management discussion, and risk factors—are explicitly marked as “not available.” This necessitates a focus on the implications of this informational void rather than an interpretation of specific disclosures.

The standard battery of forensic scores, crucial for an initial quantitative scan, is similarly unavailable. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the M-Score, cannot be calculated, preventing an assessment of potential accounting distortions. Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, is also absent, leaving the company’s financial health unquantified by this widely recognized metric. Similarly, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, and the Fog Index, a readability score, are not provided, precluding insights into operational trends or the clarity of corporate communications.

The absence of excerpts from Item 7 (MD&A) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) further limits any forensic reading. Item 7, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, typically offers management’s perspective on financial condition and results of operations, providing crucial context for understanding reported numbers. Without it, the narrative behind any potential financial performance remains opaque. Item 1A, detailing Risk Factors, is equally vital, as it outlines the material risks that could affect the company’s business, financial condition, or operating results, which are essential for assessing future viability.

Ultimately, this reading of GPC’s filing information is constrained by its very nature. The lack of specific filing details, forensic scores, and narrative excerpts means that a comprehensive forensic accounting assessment is not possible. The information provided does not allow for a determination of potential earnings manipulation, bankruptcy risk, fundamental strength, or the clarity of disclosures. Consequently, this analysis can only highlight the critical importance of these missing data points for any investor seeking to understand the underlying financial health and reporting integrity of an enterprise.

Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about GPC's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →