Alphabet Inc.

GOOG Communication Services · Internet Content & Information
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$344.91
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$244.67 — $404.47
-15% from high
Market cap
4.2T
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.3%
P/E
17.3
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Ad-driven revenue up 15.1% in 2025, but debt rose sharply and Beneish score is elevated

Neutral Beneish: -1.06Altman Z″: 6.79Piotroski: 6/9Fog: 18.9
RED DEEP 62 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-1.06
High manipulation likelihood
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
6.79
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
18.92
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a large, growing business with a demanding set of disclosures to read. Revenue in 2025 was $402.84 billion, and the risk factors state that more than 70% of 2025 total revenues came from online advertising, so advertising remains the core exposure. The risk factors also say AI is reshaping how ads are delivered and that the company may not adapt effectively, which is a specific tension to track against the Google Search & other, YouTube ads, and Google Network lines. Net income grew to $132.17 billion from $100.12 billion. Operating cash flow of $164.71 billion was 1.25 times net income, which is a cash-backed earnings signal. The forensic scores need careful reading. The Beneish M-Score of -1.058 is in the elevated manipulation-risk zone, which is a screening flag rather than a finding of wrongdoing. The Altman Z-Score of 6.79 is in the safe zone. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals. The Fog Index of 18.92 is in the very hard to read band, so the MD&A demands effort from a casual reader. Readers may want to look at the Other Bets, Google Cloud, and TPU sections, along with the Legal Matters note referenced in the 10-K, to see how the rising debt and long-duration commitments relate to the segments. The excerpt provided is truncated, so the full 10-Q and 10-K should be checked before drawing firm conclusions.

Catalyst.According to the 10-Q MD&A for the quarter ended 2026-03-31, Alphabet reports two segments, Google Services and Google Cloud, plus Other Bets. Google Services includes Google advertising (Google Search & other, YouTube ads, and Google Network) and subscriptions, platforms, and devices such as YouTube TV, Google One, and Pixel devices. Google Cloud includes Google Cloud Platform AI offerings such as Vertex AI and Gemini Enterprise, along with Google Workspace. Full-year 2025 revenue was $402.84 billion, up 15.1% from $350.02 billion in 2024, and operating income rose to $129.04 billion from $112.39 billion. The MD&A also notes limited agreements to supply Tensor Processing Units (TPU) hardware, with revenue expected to begin later in 2026 and most recognized in 2027. A recent news headline cites an AI partnership with Anthropic, but the excerpt provided does not describe its terms.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is between the balance sheet and the screening scores. Long-term debt rose from $10.88 billion at 2024 year-end to $46.55 billion at 2025 year-end, an increase of $35.67 billion, while total liabilities climbed to $180.02 billion from $125.17 billion. The risk factors state that the company is entering significant leasing arrangements with third-party operators and has large, long-duration commercial agreements that could increase liabilities if performance falls short. The Beneish M-Score of -1.058 falls in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening flag calling for a closer read of the filings, not proof of manipulation. The MD&A Fog Index of 18.92 falls in the very hard to read band.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Alphabet filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-05)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-07)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-30)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-13)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 5, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-04)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 6, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
Recent material news

What the desk read this week

Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →