Gen Digital Inc.
GEN Technology · Software - InfrastructureNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for GEN yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
This synthesis rests on a thin data set, and that limitation is the central point. The file contains annual revenue for eight fiscal years, from $4.83 billion in fiscal 2018 to $3.94 billion in fiscal 2025, but it contains no forensic scores, no MD&A text, no risk-factor text, and no news headlines classified as fact. Because of that, this write-up does not state any score value or label, and it does not compare management's narrative with the numbers, since no narrative text is available to test. For readers learning to read these filings, the four standard screens each answer a different question. The Beneish M-Score is a statistical screen that looks for patterns in reported figures, such as receivables, margins and accruals, that sometimes appear before restatements or earnings manipulation; an elevated reading is a flag for a closer read, not proof of wrongdoing. The Piotroski F-Score counts how many standard tests of profitability, leverage and operating efficiency a company passes, and it is reported as N of M computable signals, depending on which inputs are available. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from balance-sheet and earnings ratios, and it is not designed for banks or financial firms. The Fog Index estimates how hard a passage is to read based on sentence length and word complexity. None of these four is on file for Gen Digital in the data provided, so none is reported here. What the revenue series does show is a company whose reported top line has moved in clear phases: a decline to fiscal 2020, a rebuild from $2.49 billion to $3.94 billion over the following five years, and a slowing increase in fiscal 2025. Readers may want to look at the company's MD&A and risk-factor sections in its annual report to explain the fiscal 2020 break, to identify which products or segments drove the fiscal 2023 and 2024 gains, and to see what management says about slower fiscal 2025 growth. Those sections, along with any restated figures, are the next places to verify these numbers before drawing conclusions.
Catalyst.The only financial data on file for Gen Digital is reported revenue by fiscal year. Revenue reached $3.94 billion in fiscal 2025 (ended March 28, 2025), up about 3.4% from $3.81 billion in fiscal 2024. That follows a steeper gain of about 14.1% in fiscal 2024, when revenue rose from $3.34 billion in fiscal 2023. Because no MD&A text is on file, this data does not explain which products, segments or programs drove the recent growth, so the reasons for the slowdown in growth cannot be identified here.
Hidden risk.The most visible tension in the numbers is a sharp break in the longer series. Revenue fell from $4.73 billion in fiscal 2019 to $2.49 billion in fiscal 2020, a decline of about 47.4%, and the data provided does not say why. Growth since then has been positive but has slowed in the latest year to about 3.4%, after about 14.1% the year before. Because no risk-factor text is on file, readers may want to check the company's own filing sections on risk and on any changes to its business to understand the cause of that break and what could affect future revenue.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 35.4M
- Change since Aug 31
- +1.4%
- Days to cover
- 3.2
What it tells us
A noticeable minority of traders is betting that GEN shares will fall.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+1.4%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.2 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Quarterly report
The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Gen Digital filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Oct 9, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)EDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Sep 28, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Sep 11, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.07: Shareholder vote results0EDGAR →
- Aug 7, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →