First Solar, Inc.

FSLR Technology · Solar
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$232.80
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$158.81 — $320.95
-27% from high
Market cap
25B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
15.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

First Solar’s 2026 10-Q, filed April 30, 2026, leads its Management’s Discussion and Analysis with a comprehensive “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” This section emphasizes that all statements… other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, explicitly made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995’s safe harbor provisions. These statements, the filing notes, concern diverse aspects such as “effects resulting from certain module manufacturing changes” and the company’s “business strategy, including anticipated trends and developments in and management plans for our business and the markets in which we operate.” Despite this forward-looking emphasis, the filing does present historical facts: net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026, reached $1,044,240 thousand, an increase from $844,568 thousand in the prior year. Gross profit also saw a notable rise, from $344,403 thousand to $486,131 thousand, indicating a positive trend in the company’s core operations.

The forensic accounting models that often illuminate a filing’s underlying health are notably absent from this 10-Q. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, the Altman Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, and Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, are all reported as “not available.” Similarly, the Fog Index — a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ is obfuscatory — is also unavailable. Consequently, this reading cannot leverage these quantitative signals to assess potential earnings manipulation risk, financial distress, or fundamental operational strength, leaving a significant gap in the typical forensic analysis framework. The lack of these standardized metrics means that a reader must rely more heavily on qualitative assessments and direct interpretation of the financial statements provided.

Item 7’s MD&A further elaborates on the nature and scope of these forward-looking statements. It details that such statements encompass “effects resulting from certain module manufacturing changes” and the company’s “business strategy, including anticipated trends and developments in and management plans for our business.” This extensive focus suggests a company operating in an environment where future performance is highly contingent on strategic execution and market evolution, rather than solely on past results. The MD&A explicitly states that these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, underscoring the inherent volatility in projecting outcomes within the solar technology sector. This emphasis on future-oriented disclosures highlights management’s perspective on the key drivers of the business, which are inherently prospective and subject to external factors.

This filing offers a snapshot of First Solar’s recent financial performance, showcasing growth in net sales and gross profit for the quarter. It also clearly articulates management’s reliance on forward-looking statements to describe its operational outlook, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties. However, the absence of key forensic scores limits the depth of a quantitative assessment regarding potential accounting anomalies or financial stability, as these models provide a structured, data-driven lens. While the 10-Q provides a factual basis for revenue and profit trends, it does not, by itself, offer a complete picture for evaluating whether the security is mispriced. That determination would require external market data, industry analysis, and a broader understanding of the company’s competitive landscape beyond the scope of this particular filing, which primarily presents management’s perspective on its current state and future trajectory.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-02)0
    Read →
  • Feb 24, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 24, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-24)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 19, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-13)### Unknown Item hereby incorporated by reference into this... 0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about FSLR's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →