Ford Motor Company

F Consumer Cyclical · Auto Manufacturers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$14.02
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$10.68 — $17.78
-21% from high
Market cap
55.9B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
425.0%
P/E
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Ford’s 2025 10-K presents a clear operational shift in its distribution model, with the total number of dealerships worldwide decreasing from 9,006 in 2024 to 8,226 in 2025. This 8.66% reduction is a quantifiable change in the company’s primary sales channel, as Item 7 of the MD&A notes that substantially all of our vehicles, parts, and accessories are sold through distributors and dealers. This consolidation of the sales network warrants attention, particularly for a business model so reliant on independent dealerships.

The 2025 10-K, as provided, does not include calculated values for several key forensic indicators. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, and the Fog Index — readability score; 12 = newspaper, 18+ = obfuscatory, are all listed as “not available.” This absence means the filing itself offers no quantitative signals from these established frameworks regarding potential accounting irregularities, financial distress, operational strength, or textual clarity.

Beyond the dealership changes, Item 1A highlights perennial risks for the automotive sector, including those associated with shortage of components or raw materials, supplier disruptions, and inflationary pressures. These are standard disclosures, but their continued presence underscores the ongoing challenges in managing a complex global supply chain. The company also notes its active pursuit of innovation to build its intellectual property portfolio of patents, trade secrets, copyrights, and trademarks, which contribute to brand identity and recognition.

This filing offers specific, anchored observations regarding Ford’s operational structure and identified risks. However, the absence of calculated forensic scores means the document does not provide the quantitative signals typically derived from these frameworks to assess potential earnings manipulation, financial distress, or fundamental strength. While the 10-K details certain business conditions, it does not, on its own, offer the typical quantitative forensic insights into the security’s underlying accounting quality or financial health.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 2, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-02)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 27, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-14)0
    Read →
  • Mar 13, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-13)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 10, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-10)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Jan 29, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Jan 6, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Oct 24, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    Read →
  • Mar 28, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-05-08)0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about F's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →