Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

EXPD Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$198.64
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$116.84 — $199.11
-0% from high
Market cap
25.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.8%
P/E
28.9
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for EXPD yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Based only on the annual revenue and operating income figures provided, Expeditors shows a longer-term pattern of revenue growth alongside a margin that has narrowed from its high. Revenue rose from $8.14 billion in 2018 to $11.07 billion in 2025, and operating income rose from $796.56 million to $1.05 billion over the same span. However, the operating margin moved from about 9.8% in 2018 to a peak of about 11.6% in 2021 and then to about 9.5% in 2025, so profit has grown more slowly than revenue in recent years. The 2021 to 2023 period is the most striking part of the record: revenue rose to $17.07 billion in 2022 and then fell to $9.3 billion in 2023, and operating income followed a similar path. No forensic scores are on file for this company, including the Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index, so this synthesis does not assign any of them a value or reading. Those scores are screening tools that check financial statements for patterns that call for a closer look, and their absence here means that check is not part of this synthesis. The MD&A and risk-factor text that would explain the 2022 to 2023 swing, and any current drivers, are also not on file. Readers may want to read the full annual report, comparing management's explanation of revenue changes against the operating income trend, before forming their own view of the business.

Catalyst.The filing data provided for Expeditors includes only annual revenue and operating income, with no MD&A text, so the business drivers management cites cannot be confirmed here. The reported figures show revenue of $11.07 billion for 2025, up from $10.6 billion in 2024, an increase of about 4.4%. Operating income was $1.05 billion in 2025 compared with $1.04 billion in 2024, a rise of about 1%. Because operating income grew much more slowly than revenue, the operating margin (operating income divided by revenue) slipped from about 9.8% in 2024 to about 9.5% in 2025. The reasons behind these movements are not in the data provided, so readers may want to check the MD&A section of the full filing for management's explanation.

Hidden risk.No risk-factor text is on file, so this section relies on the reported figures. Revenue moved sharply over the period: it was $17.07 billion in 2022 and $9.3 billion in 2023, a decline of about 45%, while operating income fell from $1.82 billion to $939.93 million, a decline of about 48%. A business whose top line can move this much in one year may be exposed to conditions that the annual figures alone do not explain. The risks management identifies for this pattern are not in the data provided, so readers may want to review the risk factors section of the full filing before drawing conclusions.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what EXPD reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.9%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
4.4M
Change since Aug 31
+1.6%
Days to cover
4.3

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against EXPD. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+1.6%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.3 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Expeditors International of Washington filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →