Evergy, Inc.

EVRG Utilities · Utilities - Regulated Electric
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$81.57
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$71.41 — $88.62
-8% from high
Market cap
18.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.4%
P/E
20.8
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for EVRG yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The data on file covers four reported lines only: revenues, net income, operating income and total assets. No forensic scores are on file, so this synthesis gives no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score or Fog Index value, and none should be inferred from the figures here. The Beneish score is a screen that compares several year-over-year relationships in a company's financial statements to flag possible earnings manipulation. The Piotroski score counts a set of profitability, leverage and efficiency checks that pass or fail. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk. The Fog Index measures how hard text is to read. Each would need its own computed label before it could be interpreted in a filing review. Within the reported figures, the picture is one of steady scale. Revenues moved from $4.22 billion in 2018 to $5.71 billion in 2025, and total assets moved from $30.98 billion in 2023 to $33.95 billion in 2025, an increase of about 9.6 percent over two years. Revenue fell from $5.59 billion in 2022 to $5.35 billion in 2023, then recovered to $5.7 billion in 2024 and held near that level in 2025. Operating income reached $1.53 billion in 2025, but net income of $855.6 million was below the $873.5 million reported for 2024 and the $879.7 million peak of 2021. Readers may want to look at the 10-K's MD&A and risk factors sections for the reasons behind the gap between operating and net income, which the data here does not explain.

Catalyst.The MD&A text is not on file, so this section cannot attribute any driver to management's own explanation. The reported figures show revenues of $5.71 billion in 2025, essentially flat from $5.7 billion in 2024, and operating income that rose about 4.1 percent to $1.53 billion from $1.47 billion. That combination implies operating margin widened from about 25.8 percent to about 26.8 percent of revenues. Total assets increased to $33.95 billion from $32.28 billion, about 5.2 percent, which indicates the balance sheet expanded during the year. Without the MD&A, the reasons for these changes are unknown from the data available.

Hidden risk.The most visible tension in the reported figures is that operating income rose about 4.1 percent in 2025, to $1.53 billion from $1.47 billion, while net income fell about 2.0 percent, to $855.6 million from $873.5 million, a drop of $17.9 million. Net income as a share of operating income fell from about 59.4 percent in 2024 to about 55.9 percent in 2025, and net margin slipped from 15.3 percent to 15.0 percent. Total assets grew 5.2 percent over the same year, so net income over total assets fell from about 2.7 percent to 2.5 percent. The data does not show why the gap widened, and no risk-factor text is on file to explain it. A casual reader could take the higher operating income as the whole story, but the lower net figure is where the reported numbers pull the other way.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what EVRG reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
9.4%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
18.4M
Change since Aug 31
+0.6%
Days to cover
7.7

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that EVRG shares will fall.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+0.6%).

Short sellers would need about 7.7 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Evergy filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.02: Ended a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other events
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →