Erie Indemnity Company

ERIE Financial Services · Insurance Brokers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$238.69
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$204.63 — $330.54
-28% from high
Market cap
12.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.5%
P/E
21.6
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for ERIE yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

No forensic scores are on file for Erie Indemnity, so this synthesis does not report a Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index, and no score-based flag is implied in either direction. The Beneish M-Score is a screening model that estimates the likelihood that reported earnings are manipulated, the Piotroski F-Score counts how many of a set of profitability, leverage and efficiency checks a company passes, the Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk, and the Fog Index measures how hard a filing is to read. None of these can be read from the data provided. The longer financial trend is the clearest thing the data shows. Revenues grew from $2.38 billion in 2018 to $4.07 billion in 2025, a compound annual growth rate of about 8.0%. Net income rose from $288.22 million to $559.34 million over the same span, about 9.9% a year, but it did not move in a straight line. It fell about 7.4% in 2020 to $293.3 million, was nearly flat in 2022 at $298.57 million, jumped about 34.6% to $600.31 million in 2024, and then declined about 6.8% in 2025. Operating income rose faster than net income over the period, from $344.34 million to $717.18 million. Because the MD&A and risk-factor text are not on file, this synthesis cannot name the segments, products, programs, legal matters, debt instruments, or regulations that management or the 10-K identifies as drivers of these results. Readers may want to look at the MD&A and risk-factor sections of the 10-K directly to identify those items and to see how management explains the gap between operating income and net income in 2025.

Catalyst.The data provided contains no MD&A text, so the drivers management cites cannot be read directly here. The financial facts show revenues rising to $4.07 billion for fiscal 2025, up from $3.8 billion in 2024, a gain of about 7.1%. Revenues were $3.27 billion in 2023, so 2024 growth was about 16.2%. Operating income reached $717.18 million in 2025, up about 6.0% from $676.46 million in 2024. Taken together, the reported top-line and operating figures point to continued expansion in the business over the last two years.

Hidden risk.The most visible tension in the numbers is between operating income and net income. Net income fell to $559.34 million in 2025 from $600.31 million in 2024, a decline of about 6.8%, even though operating income rose about 6.0% over the same period. Net income equaled about 78% of operating income in 2025, compared with about 89% in 2024. The data does not explain this gap, and no risk-factor text is on file to address it. Readers may want to look at the income statement and related notes in the 10-K to see what sits between the two lines.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ERIE reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
10.2%
of the shares available to trade
High
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
2.6M
Change since Aug 31
−2.7%
Days to cover
9.1

What it tells us

A large group of traders is betting that ERIE shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−2.7%).

Short sellers would need about 9.1 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current report (8-K) Erie Indemnity Company filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Jul 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →