DaVita Inc.

DVA Healthcare · Medical Care Facilities
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$219.70
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$101.00 — $221.59
-1% from high
Market cap
14.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
21.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

DaVita’s Q1 2026 10-Q dedicates notable attention to its capital allocation strategy, particularly share repurchases. The company executed significant share repurchases (a company buying back its own stock from the open market) during the first quarter of 2026, acquiring 3,005 thousand shares at an average price of $133.70. This activity, detailed in Item 2, leaves an approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under existing programs totaling $1,756,319 thousand as of March 31, 2026. The consistent execution across January, February, and March, with 1,658 thousand, 522 thousand, and 825 thousand shares repurchased respectively, suggests a deliberate, rather than opportunistic, approach to managing outstanding equity. Such programs reflect management’s ongoing commitment to returning capital to shareholders, a common practice that can influence per-share metrics by reducing the total share count, though the filing does not elaborate on the specific rationale beyond Board authorizations.

The customary forensic accounting metrics, such as Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, and Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, are not available for this filing. Similarly, the Fog Index — a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscatory prose — is also absent from the provided data. This absence means the filing cannot be assessed for potential earnings manipulation signals, financial distress indicators, or the fundamental strength of its operations through these established quantitative frameworks. Consequently, this reading relies solely on the qualitative and quantitative data explicitly presented in the excerpts, without the benefit of these academically-derived benchmarks for comparative analysis or early warning signs.

Turning to the Consolidated Statements of Income in Item 7, DaVita reported an increase in total revenues, moving from $3,223,529 thousand in the three months ended March 31, 2025, to $3,415,548 thousand for the same period in 2026. This growth was primarily driven by dialysis patient service revenues, which rose from $3,102,993 thousand to $3,272,797 thousand year-over-year. Operating income also saw an improvement, reaching $481,892 thousand in Q1 2026, up from $438,937 thousand in Q1 2025, indicating an expansion of profitability before non-operating items. However, this top-line and operating income growth was accompanied by increased operating expenses, with patient care costs rising from $2,239,660 thousand to $2,342,257 thousand, and general and administrative expenses increasing from $374,090 thousand to $421,914 thousand. The concurrent rise in both revenues and expenses suggests a business operating with consistent activity levels, where debt expense also increased from $135,055 thousand to $145,131 thousand.

This forensic reading, constrained by the provided excerpts and the absence of key analytical scores, offers a snapshot of DaVita’s capital allocation and operational performance. The filing clearly communicates the company’s active share repurchase program and its ability to generate increased revenues and operating income year-over-year. However, without the Beneish M-Score, Altman Z″, Piotroski F-Score, or Fog Index, a deeper assessment of potential accounting risk, financial distress, fundamental quality, or the clarity of disclosure remains beyond the scope of this analysis. The information presented, while numerically specific regarding revenue and expense trends, does not provide the qualitative context or the quantitative red flags that these established forensic metrics are designed to uncover. Therefore, while the filing illustrates a company engaged in significant share repurchases and demonstrating top-line growth, it does not offer the comprehensive forensic insights typically derived from a full suite of analytical tools.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-05)### Item 2.02 (including Exhibit 99 .1 attached hereto) is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securitie0
    Read →
  • May 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Apr 22, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-31)0
    Read →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Feb 2, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-02-02)### Item 2.02 (including Exhibit 99 .1 attached hereto) is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securitie0
    Read →
  • Nov 25, 2025
    8-K
    Material event (2025-11-24)### Item 1.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated herein by reference .... 0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about DVA's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →