Duke Energy Corporation
DUK Utilities · Utilities - Regulated ElectricNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for DUK yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
The data on file contains no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score or Fog Index, so this synthesis gives no forensic readings and makes no claim about manipulation risk or readability. Readers may want to look for those scores in a separate source before drawing conclusions. What the numbers do show is a multi-year earnings picture that is recovering. Annual net income rose to $4.97 billion in 2025 from $4.52 billion in 2024, about 10.0%, and operating income rose to $8.63 billion from $7.93 billion, about 8.8%. Net income was $1.38 billion in 2020 against $3.75 billion in 2019, a sharp dip the data does not explain. The revenue series in the data ends at 2016, so no current revenue trend can be drawn from it. In the 10-Q, the most important structural point is that the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment grew revenue by $738 million while its segment income fell $22 million. Fuel costs rose $321 million, and operation, maintenance and other expense rose $285 million, including a legal settlement and storm costs at Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress. Indiana electricity sales fell 364 GWh, about 4.4%, while Florida sales rose 248 GWh. The Other segment reported interest expense of $349 million against $318 million and a net loss of $263 million. Readers may want to look at the 10-K risk factors on relicensing of 11 reactors at six nuclear stations and on nuclear production tax credits, since the electric effective tax rate fell to 9.0% from 12.7% on higher PTC amortization.
Catalyst.According to the Q1 2026 MD&A, the main driver of Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue was higher pricing from rate cases, which added $202 million, plus a $286 million increase in fuel revenues tied to higher fuel rates. Management attributes the adjusted EPS increase from $1.76 to $1.93 mainly to recovery of infrastructure investments in growing jurisdictions, along with improved weather. Gas Utilities and Infrastructure operating income rose to $875 million from $487 million, largely because of the $374 million gain on the sale of Piedmont's Tennessee business. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure operating income fell $43 million to $1,843 million, and its segment income declined $22 million.
Hidden risk.The GAAP EPS increase is flattered by one-time items. Q1 2026 GAAP earnings of $1,536 million include a $171 million after-tax benefit from asset sales, offset in part by a $150 million after-tax legal and regulatory settlement charge. Excluding these items, adjusted earnings were $1,502 million. The 9.7% adjusted EPS gain ($1.93 versus $1.76) is smaller than the 11.9% GAAP gain ($1.97 versus $1.76). The 10-K risk factors also say regulators can disallow cost recovery, reduce rates if earnings exceed allowed returns, and that nuclear production tax credits could be eliminated or reduced. The data on file contains no forensic scores and no news, so this read rests only on the filings.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 17.8M
- Change since Aug 31
- +3.8%
- Days to cover
- 4.4
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against DUK. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+3.8%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.4 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Duke Energy filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Sep 25, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 8.01: Other eventsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Aug 5, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Aug 4, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Aug 3, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Jul 17, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- May 5, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-05-05)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- May 5, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310EDGAR →
- Apr 1, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-03-31)Item 2.01: Completed an acquisition or sale of assets; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Mar 20, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-05-07)0EDGAR →
- Mar 16, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-03-16)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement0EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →