Domino's Pizza, Inc.

DPZ Consumer Cyclical · Restaurants
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$294.05
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$282.00 — $496.00
-41% from high
Market cap
9.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
267.0%
P/E
16.9
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Domino’s Pizza, Inc.’s most recent 10-Q filing notes no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting estimates since December 28, 2025, referring readers to the prior 10-K for a full discussion. Critical accounting estimates (management’s most subjective judgments in financial reporting) include long-lived assets, casualty insurance reserves, and income taxes. This consistency suggests a stable approach to areas requiring significant judgment. The document also highlights the prevalence of forward-looking statements, a standard disclosure under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”), which aims to protect companies from liability for their projections.

The forensic accounting metrics typically used to scan for potential issues are not available for this filing. Beneish’s M-Score (Beneish, 1999), an eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, cannot be calculated. Similarly, Altman’s Z″ (Altman, 1968), a bankruptcy-distress index, is not provided. Piotroski’s F-Score (Piotroski, 2000), a 9-point fundamental strength scan, is also absent, as is the Fog Index (Gunning, 1952), a readability score. The lack of these quantitative signals means that this reading cannot offer an algorithmic assessment of potential financial stress or reporting complexity.

Item 7 of the MD&A emphasizes the nature of the filing’s forward-looking statements, noting they are based on current management expectations that involve “substantial risks and uncertainties.” This standard disclosure, made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, alerts readers that actual results could “differ materially” from projections. Such language is common in SEC filings, but its prominence here underscores management’s explicit acknowledgment of the inherent unpredictability in business outcomes, even for established entities. It serves as a reminder that reported expectations are not guarantees.

This 10-Q provides a snapshot of the company’s financial position, showing, for instance, an increase in cash and cash equivalents from $125,675 thousand to $232,922 thousand between December 28, 2025, and March 22, 2026. However, without the benefit of forensic scores or more extensive MD&A excerpts, this reading cannot assess the security’s potential mispricing or the underlying quality of earnings. The filing’s primary utility, in this context, is to confirm the consistency of critical accounting estimates and the boilerplate nature of forward-looking disclosures. A deeper dive would require the full 10-K and the calculation of the absent quantitative metrics.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-21)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-27)### Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and therefore shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 .... 0
    Read →
  • Apr 27, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-22)Period: 2026-03-220
    Read →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-21)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 10, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-03-09)0
    Read →
  • Feb 23, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-28)Period: 2025-12-280
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about DPZ's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →