Dollar Tree, Inc.

DLTR Consumer Defensive · Discount Stores
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$122.62
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$84.71 — $142.40
-14% from high
Market cap
23.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
No dividend declared
P/E
19.7
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Dollar Tree’s 2026 10-K, specifically within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), opens with a particularly robust disclaimer regarding its forward-looking statements (the company’s predictions about future performance). The company states it “cannot assure you that the results, events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur,” and that actual outcomes “could differ materially.” This sets a clear, if cautious, tone for interpreting any future-oriented disclosures within the document.

The forensic scores, designed to flag potential accounting issues or financial distress, are not available for this filing. Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, for instance, typically provides a quantitative measure of earnings quality. Similarly, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index — would offer insight into the company’s solvency profile. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, would assess profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency. The Fog Index — a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ is obfuscatory — would indicate the document’s complexity.

The MD&A’s explicit statement that we do not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the filing date is a noteworthy disclosure. This clause, common in SEC filings, explicitly limits the company’s obligation to inform shareholders if its future projections, events, or circumstances differ materially from those described. It places a significant burden on the reader to assess the durability of these forward-looking statements without guaranteed updates from management.

Without the quantitative context of forensic scores or detailed financial figures, this filing primarily offers insight into the company’s disclosure posture. It cannot, for instance, inform a view on whether DLTR the security is mispriced, nor can it provide a comprehensive assessment of operational performance or underlying financial health. It does, however, highlight the company’s explicit stance on the reliability and updating of its forward-looking statements, which is a crucial aspect of investor due diligence.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-07)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • May 1, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-16)0
    Read →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-19)### Unknown Item this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference into this... ### Item 1.01 above, upon its expiration on March 20, 2026, all comm0
    Read →
  • Mar 16, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-16)### Unknown Item incorporated by reference into this... 0
    Read →
  • Mar 16, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-01-31)Period: 2026-01-310
    Read →
  • Dec 3, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-11-01)Period: 2025-11-010
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about DLTR's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →