Dell Technologies Inc.

DELL Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$473.39
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$110.22 — $595.51
-21% from high
Market cap
301B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.5%
P/E
27.5
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for DELL yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

This synthesis is limited by what is on file. The data includes annual revenue for eight fiscal years and operating income for four fiscal years, drawn from XBRL company facts. It does not include MD&A text, risk-factor text, FACT-classified news headlines, or forensic scores. For that reason, this write-up cannot explain why revenue or operating income changed, and it cannot compare management's description of the business with the reported numbers. What the figures do show is a fiscal 2026 year in which revenue reached $113.54 billion and operating income reached $8.15 billion, both higher than the prior year. Operating margin was about 5.6% in fiscal 2023, about 5.9% in fiscal 2024, about 6.5% in fiscal 2025, and about 7.2% in fiscal 2026. That pattern shows a gradual widening over the four years for which operating income is on file, but it does not show why. No Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index is on file for DELL, so none is reported here. A Beneish M-Score is a screening model that looks for patterns sometimes associated with earnings manipulation, and an elevated result is a prompt for a closer read rather than proof of wrongdoing. A Piotroski F-Score counts how many of a set of financial-health checks a company passes. An Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk. A Fog Index estimates how hard a passage of text is to read. Readers may want to look at the forensic scores once they are available, and at the company's own 10-K, particularly the MD&A and risk factors sections, to test the figures above against management's explanations.

Catalyst.The data on file does not include MD&A text, so this section cannot report what management attributes the results to. The reported figures show revenue of $113.54 billion in fiscal 2026, up from $95.57 billion in fiscal 2025, an increase of about 18.8%. Operating income rose from $6.24 billion to $8.15 billion over the same period, an increase of about 30.6%. Because operating income grew faster than revenue, the operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by revenue, moved from about 6.5% to about 7.2%. The drivers behind these changes are not in the data provided.

Hidden risk.Revenue has not moved in a straight line. In fiscal 2023 revenue was $102.3 billion, and it fell to $88.42 billion in fiscal 2024, a decline of about 13.6%. Operating income fell about 9.7% over that same year, from $5.77 billion to $5.21 billion. The fiscal 2026 rebound therefore follows a period of decline. The risk-factor text that would explain how exposed the business is to swings like this is not on file, so this write-up cannot describe it.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what DELL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.2%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
12.3M
Change since Aug 31
−14.8%
Days to cover
1.1

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against DELL. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 14.8% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Dell Technologies filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 8, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →