Deckers Outdoor Corporation

DECK Consumer Cyclical · Footwear & Accessories
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$86.58
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$77.20 — $122.29
-29% from high
Market cap
11.8B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
12.4
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for DECK yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

This synthesis is limited by what is on file. There are no forensic scores for Deckers Outdoor in the data, so this analysis does not report a Beneish M-Score, a Piotroski F-Score, an Altman Z-Score, or a Fog Index, and no reading should be inferred from their absence. Readers learning to use these tools should know what each would have added. The Beneish M-Score is a screen for patterns that sometimes accompany earnings manipulation; an elevated reading is a flag for a closer look, not proof of wrongdoing. The Piotroski F-Score counts a set of profitability, leverage, and efficiency signals. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk, and the Fog Index estimates how hard a document is to read. None of these is available here. The numbers that are on file tell a consistent story of growth: revenue reached $4.99 billion in fiscal 2025, up from $2.02 billion in fiscal 2019, and operating income reached $1.18 billion in fiscal 2025, up from $504.2 million in fiscal 2021. Because no MD&A, risk-factor, or news text is on file, the business drivers, legal matters, debt instruments, and regulatory exposures that a complete filing review would cover cannot be named or assessed from this data. Readers may want to look at the company's annual report on Form 10-K directly, particularly the MD&A and Item 1A risk factors, to check the margin expansion discussed above and to find the segment and product detail that this synthesis cannot supply.

Catalyst.The filing text needed to explain what is driving the business, including the MD&A, is not on file for this synthesis, so no management explanation can be attributed here. The reported numbers show revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 at $4.99 billion, up from $4.29 billion in fiscal 2024, a gain of about 16.3%. Revenue has risen steadily across the years in the data, from $2.02 billion in fiscal 2019 to $4.99 billion in fiscal 2025. The cause of that growth cannot be confirmed from the data provided.

Hidden risk.The most visible tension in the numbers is that operating income grew faster than revenue. Operating income rose from $927.51 million in fiscal 2024 to $1.18 billion in fiscal 2025, about 27.2%, while revenue rose about 16.3%. Operating margin, meaning operating income divided by revenue, moved from roughly 21.6% to roughly 23.6%. A reader may want to look at the MD&A and risk factors to learn whether that margin gain is durable or tied to pricing, cost timing, or other one-time items. Those sections are not on file here, so the question stays open.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what DECK reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
9.7%
of the shares available to trade
Moderate
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
11.8M
Change since Aug 31
+32.5%
Days to cover
3.5

What it tells us

A noticeable minority of traders is betting that DECK shares will fall.

Short sellers added to their bets: shares sold short grew 32.5% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.5 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly report

The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) Deckers Outdoor filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →