Delta Air Lines, Inc.

DAL Industrials · Airlines
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$78.08
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$55.03 — $95.68
-18% from high
Market cap
51.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.1%
P/E
15.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Delta's reported revenue jump leans on refinery sales; adjusted growth is narrower.

Neutral Beneish: -2.62Altman Z″: 0.03Piotroski: 6/9Fog: 16.5
RED DEEP 57 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.62
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
0.03
Distress zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
16.51
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings describe a larger, more profitable airline, but the scores and adjusted figures call for a careful read. Revenue grew 2.8% in 2025 to $63.36 billion, net income rose to $5 billion, and operating cash flow reached $8.34 billion, an operating cash flow to net income ratio of 1.67. Long-term debt fell to $11.94 billion from $13.55 billion, and equity rose to $20.85 billion from $15.29 billion. The 10-K states that reducing debt remains a financial priority and that Delta is rated investment grade by all three major rating agencies. The scores are mixed. The Beneish M-Score is -2.620, which the label places outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening threshold, not proof that the numbers are accurate. The Altman Z-double-prime score is 0.03, which the label places in the distress zone. It is a statistical screen built on balance sheet ratios and does not predict default, but it is a warning to weigh against the cash generation. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 7 computable signals, meaning six of the seven applicable checks on profitability, leverage and efficiency were passed. The Fog Index of 16.51 falls in the hard-to-read band of 14 to 18, so the MD&A requires patience. The 10-Q relies on non-GAAP measures that remove refinery sales, fuel hedge timing, MRO expense and profit sharing. The reconciliations are disclosed, but readers may want to compare GAAP and adjusted lines side by side, since adjusted revenue growth of about 15.7% is well below the reported 21.1%. A 2026 change in how Monroe inventory hedge settlements are treated also shifts adjusted results in timing. Readers may want to read the full 10-K risk factor section, since the excerpt provided is largely business description.

Catalyst.The 10-Q covers the three months ended September 30, 2026, when total revenue was $20.19 billion, up from $16.67 billion a year earlier, about 21.1%. Much of that gain came from third-party refinery sales, which rose to $2.6 billion from $1.48 billion, a 76.2% increase. Excluding those sales, adjusted total revenue was $17.59 billion versus $15.20 billion, about 15.7% higher. Average fuel cost per gallon rose to $3.80 from $2.26. In the 2025 10-K, revenue grew 2.8% to $63.36 billion, and net income reached $5 billion.

Hidden risk.The most material tension is concentration plus measurement. The 2025 10-K says remuneration from American Express totaled $8.2 billion in 2025 and is expected to grow to $10 billion, so a single co-brand contract supports a large share of the premium revenue story. Refinery sales, which management excludes from adjusted results, now make up a meaningful share of reported revenue. Operating income fell about 3% in 2025, to $5.82 billion from $6 billion, while net income rose to $5 billion from $3.46 billion. The data does not break out the non-operating items behind that gap.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what DAL reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.9%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
25.6M
Change since Aug 31
+1.2%
Days to cover
3.6

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against DAL. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+1.2%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.6 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Delta Air Lines filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 9, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-09-30)Period: 2026-09-300
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-10-09)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-07-10)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 10, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 22, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-06-18)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-18)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 8, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-08)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 17, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-17)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-27)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →