CVS Health Corporation
CVS Healthcare · Healthcare PlansNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for CVS yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
The data available for this synthesis is limited to eight fiscal years of total revenue from XBRL company facts. On that measure the picture is one of steady expansion: revenue rose from $193.92 billion in 2018 to $402.07 billion in 2025, an increase of $208.15 billion. Year-over-year, the series grew by 10.9% in 2023, 4.2% in 2024 and 7.8% in 2025. Those figures describe scale and growth in the top line only. They do not show margins, earnings, cash generation, debt levels or how revenue is distributed across the business, because no income statement detail, balance sheet or cash flow lines are included in this dataset. The Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score and Fog Index are not on file for CVS, so this synthesis gives no score values and draws no conclusion from them. A reader who wants to test the revenue trend against profitability should look at the full annual report, including the statement of operations, the cash flow statement and the MD&A. Readers may also want to check the risk factors section for the specific regulatory, reimbursement and competitive matters the company discloses, since none of that text is available here. Because growth slowed in 2024 before recovering in 2025, the revenue line alone does not explain why, and any explanation would need the MD&A text that is missing from this dataset.
Catalyst.The only data available for CVS is annual total revenue from XBRL company facts, with no MD&A text on file, so this synthesis cannot attribute growth to specific segments, products, programs or management actions. The revenue series shows growth in every year provided: $322.47 billion in 2022, $357.78 billion in 2023 (up 10.9%), $372.81 billion in 2024 (up 4.2%) and $402.07 billion in 2025 (up 7.8%). The 2024 slowdown was followed by a faster increase in 2025. What drove those changes is not stated in the data provided, so readers may want to look at the MD&A section of the company's annual report for management's explanation of recent results.
Hidden risk.The main gap a casual reader could miss is that revenue alone says little about financial health. Revenue can rise while costs, margins, debt or cash flow move in the opposite direction, and none of those lines are included here. No risk-factor text is on file, so the regulatory, reimbursement, competitive or legal exposures a company discloses cannot be assessed from this dataset. No forensic scores are on file either, so there is no screening signal from the Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score or Fog Index to weigh alongside the top-line trend.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 16.5M
- Change since Aug 31
- −9.1%
- Days to cover
- 2.1
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against CVS. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−9.1%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.1 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Quarterly report
The quarterly report (10-Q) and current reports (8-K) CVS Health filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →