Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
CTSH Technology · Information Technology ServicesNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for CTSH yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
Read against its own filings, Cognizant's story is one of operating gains paired with a flat bottom line. Revenue grew from $19.74 billion to $21.11 billion, and operating income grew from $2.89 billion to $3.39 billion, which lifted operating margin from about 14.6% to about 16.1%. Net income, however, was $2.23 billion against $2.24 billion, so net margin slipped to about 10.6%. The data provided does not show why, and a careful reader would want the full income statement, including non-operating items and taxes, before drawing conclusions about earnings quality. Management's narrative centers on Project Leap, which the 10-Q describes as funding AI capabilities, partnerships and workforce upskilling while reducing positions where business needs and local law allow. That is a restructuring story, and the excerpts do not quantify the expected charges or their timing, which are said to be described under Business Outlook. The risk-factor excerpt emphasizes client concentration and AI-native competitors that could disrupt clients' businesses. On forensic scores, none of the Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score or Fog Index is on file for this company, so this synthesis does not report any of them and draws no manipulation, financial-strength or readability conclusion from scores. Readers who want that screening may want to check the scores directly with a current source and read each score's label before interpreting it. The data also omits segment revenue, cash flow and balance sheet figures, so this analysis cannot assess liquidity or debt. Readers may want to look at Note 2 and the segment disclosures in the 10-K to see which of the four segments drove growth.
Catalyst.Per the 10-K and the Business Outlook section of the Q1 2026 10-Q, Cognizant's current focus is AI-led transformation across four industry segments: Health Sciences, Financial Services, Products and Resources, and Communications, Media and Technology. Annual revenues rose from $19.74 billion in 2024 to $21.11 billion in 2025, an increase of about 6.9%. Operating income climbed from $2.89 billion to $3.39 billion, roughly 17.3% higher. The filings tie this to Project Leap, a program that funds AI capabilities, partnerships and workforce upskilling while optimizing the company's technology footprint. The excerpt does not give segment revenue figures or total restructuring charges.
Hidden risk.The most material tension may be between operating and net income. Operating income rose about 17% in 2025, but net income fell slightly, from $2.24 billion to $2.23 billion, and net margin dropped from about 11.3% to about 10.6%. The provided data does not include interest, tax or other items that would explain the gap, so readers may want to check the full income statement. Project Leap also involves position eliminations, which the 10-Q says are subject to local law and consultation requirements, along with restructuring charges whose amounts are not in the excerpt. The risk-factor text notes that losing a significant client could materially reduce segment revenue.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 33.1M
- Change since Aug 31
- −7.2%
- Days to cover
- 5.2
What it tells us
A noticeable minority of traders is betting that CTSH shares will fall.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−7.2%).
Short sellers would need about 5.2 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Cognizant Technology Solutions filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Oct 6, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligationEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Jul 29, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Jul 29, 202610-QQuarterly report0EDGAR →
- Jul 10, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Apr 29, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310EDGAR →
- Apr 29, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0EDGAR →
- Apr 17, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-06-02)0EDGAR →
- Feb 26, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0EDGAR →
- Feb 12, 202610-KAnnual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310EDGAR →
- Feb 4, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-04)No specific items found in 8-K.0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →