Cintas Corporation

CTAS Industrials · Specialty Business Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$213.06
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$161.16 — $219.17
-3% from high
Market cap
84.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.0%
P/E
42.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Cintas grew revenue 8.9% in fiscal 2026 while the pending UniFirst deal awaits FTC review.

Bullish Beneish: -2.52Altman Z″: 7.44Piotroski: 7/9Fog: 16.2
RED DEEP 95 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.52
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
7.44
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
7
Strong
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
16.24
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The annual numbers and the forensic scores point in the same general direction, but the pending UniFirst transaction is the item a reader most needs to track. Fiscal 2026 revenue of $11.26 billion rose 8.9% from $10.34 billion, net income reached $2 billion, and operating cash flow of $2.28 billion was 1.14 times net income. The Beneish M-Score of -2.516 is below the -1.78 threshold and is labeled not in the elevated zone. In plain terms, this is a screening result that shows no elevated manipulation-risk flag, not proof that the financial statements are accurate. The Altman Z-Score of 3.57 is in the safe zone above 2.99, which indicates a low statistical distress reading rather than a forecast. The Piotroski F-Score is 8 of 9 computable signals, meaning eight of the nine scoring tests were passed on the data available. The Fog Index of 16.24 falls in the 14 to 18 band labeled hard to read, so the MD&A asks more effort from a casual reader than the numbers do. Long-term debt fell from $2.42 billion to $1.43 billion over fiscal 2026, while total assets rose to $10.53 billion and equity to $5.14 billion. Readers may want to look at the Merger Agreement terms, the FTC timing agreement, and the transaction expenses disclosed in the 10-Q, and to compare the quarter's margin gains with the workday and acquisition effects the company itself quantifies.

Catalyst.Management's MD&A attributes current growth to new business, penetration of additional products and services into existing customers, price increases, and strong customer retention in the Uniform Rental and Facility Services segment. For the three months ended August 31, 2026, total revenue rose 10.9% to $3,014.0 million, and organic growth was 8.9%. Uniform Rental and Facility Services revenue was $2,294.7 million, up 9.7%. Operating income reached $711.9 million, or 23.6% of revenue, compared with 22.7% a year earlier. Management credits more efficient use of in-service inventory, strategic sourcing and fixed-cost leverage. Fiscal 2026 annual revenue was $11.26 billion, up from $10.34 billion. The company also describes a pending merger with UniFirst Corporation, valued at approximately $5.5 billion.

Hidden risk.The largest item a casual reader could miss is the UniFirst transaction. Each UniFirst share would convert into $155.00 in cash and 0.7720 Cintas shares, so the deal ties Cintas to a substantial cash outlay and share issuance. The FTC issued a Second Request on June 11, 2026, and on October 2, 2026 the parties agreed not to close before December 11, 2026 unless the FTC closes its investigation first. Cintas incurred $15.7 million of transaction expenses in the quarter. The 10-Q also notes that 1.7% of quarterly revenue growth came from one additional workday, which does not repeat as a structural trend. The MD&A itself scores hard to read, which can make these details harder to find.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what CTAS reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
4.2%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
12.5M
Change since Aug 31
+7.4%
Days to cover
6.0

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against CTAS. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+7.4%).

Short sellers would need about 6.0 days of normal trading to buy back every borrowed share. A slow exit like that can make a rush to cover sharper.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Cintas filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 7, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-08-31)Period: 2026-08-310
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-10-06)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-09-23)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 15, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-10-27)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 27, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-08-26)No specific items found in 8-K.
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 3, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-05-31)Period: 2026-05-310
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 15, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →