Cisco Systems, Inc.

CSCO Technology · Communication Equipment
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$109.85
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$68.95 — $130.37
-16% from high
Market cap
433.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
1.5%
P/E
33.0
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Cisco's FY2025 revenue rose 5.3%, while operating income and net income fell.

Neutral Beneish: -2.62Altman Z″: 1.30Piotroski: 6/9
RED DEEP 65 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.62
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
1.30
Grey zone
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
6
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings describe a business whose revenue and reported profit are moving in different directions. On the Beneish M-Score, the score of -2.605 sits below the -1.78 threshold and is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. In plain terms, this is a screening result that does not flag the reported figures for a closer read on that test; it is not proof that the numbers are accurate. The Altman Z″-Score of 1.30 falls in the grey zone, which is the band between 1.10 and 2.60, meaning the screen does not place Cisco clearly in either the safe or the distressed category. Operating cash flow divided by net income was 1.39 for fiscal 2025, meaning cash from operations ran above reported net income; that is a useful comfort point, but it does not show the trend in fiscal 2026, when operating cash flow declined. The Piotroski and Fog Index scores are not on file for this analysis, so no value is given for either. Readers may want to look at several specific items: the rise in short-term debt, the Item 3 disclosure of $24.8 billion in senior fixed-rate notes, the $0.7 billion of funding commitments tied to privately held investments, the $2.1 billion carrying value of those investments, and the financing guarantees extended to channel partners described in the MD&A. The 10-Q also shows a provision for income taxes of only $15 million in the first six months of fiscal 2025, compared with $1.00 billion in fiscal 2026, which makes year-over-year net income comparisons in that period harder to read directly. The risk factors also name AI, industry consolidation, and shifts in product mix as sources of earnings fluctuation, which ties the revenue story to areas where management itself flags uncertainty.

Catalyst.Revenue is the clearest positive in the filings. Fiscal 2025 revenue was $56.65 billion, up 5.3% from $53.8 billion in fiscal 2024. In the first six months of fiscal 2026 (ended January 24, 2026), total revenue reached $30.2 billion, compared with $27.8 billion in the same period a year earlier. Product revenue was $22.7 billion, up from $20.3 billion, while services revenue was roughly flat at $7.5 billion. Operating income for the six months rose to $7.14 billion from $5.47 billion. The MD&A excerpt provided does not spell out the specific drivers behind this growth, so readers may want to look at the full MD&A for that explanation.

Hidden risk.The balance sheet and cash flows show a tension a casual reader could miss. Short-term debt rose to $8.72 billion at January 24, 2026 from $5.23 billion at July 26, 2025, and total debt (short-term plus long-term) moved from about $28.1 billion to about $30.1 billion. Over the first six months, Cisco issued $4.24 billion of debt and paid $3.23 billion in dividends and $3.36 billion in repurchases of common stock, while operating cash flow fell to $5.03 billion from $5.90 billion. Cash and cash equivalents declined to $7.46 billion from $8.35 billion. The market-risk section also notes a 50 basis point rate move would change the fair value of fixed-rate debt by about $0.8 billion.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what CSCO reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.3%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
51.1M
Change since Aug 31
−8.1%
Days to cover
2.8

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against CSCO. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−8.1%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.8 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Cisco Systems filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 9, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 2, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 6, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-31)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-01-24)Period: 2026-01-240
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 11, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-11)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 17, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-12-16)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 12, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-12)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 28, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-12-16)0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 3, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-07-26)Period: 2025-07-260
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →