Salesforce, Inc.

CRM Technology · Software - Application
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$252.05
Aug 27, 2026
52-week range
$146.32 — $269.11
-6% from high
Market cap
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
86.0%
P/E
23.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Aug 27, 2026

Fairly valued.

Salesforce pivots to autonomous AI agents amid slowing seat-based growth and margin expansion focus.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Salesforce, Inc.’s 2025 10-Q, filed December 4, 2025, provides a look into the company’s operational commitments and strategic outlays. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) in Item 7 notes the expectation of additional investments in enterprise cloud computing services during the nine months ended October 31, 2025, and in future years. These investments are intended to facilitate scaling with customers and evolving security measures. The company anticipates meeting these obligations using existing cash on its balance sheet and cash generated from operating activities.

The customary forensic accounting metrics, such as Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, and Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, are not available for this filing. Similarly, the Fog Index — a readability score where 12 equals a newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscation — is also not provided. The absence of these quantitative signals means the filing must be interpreted primarily through its qualitative disclosures and raw financial figures, without the immediate context these established frameworks typically offer.

Item 7 of the MD&A details the company’s lease obligations, directing readers to Note 5 “Leases and Other Commitments” for specifics as of October 31, 2025. This focus on commitments is material because lease obligations represent future fixed payments that impact cash flow and financial flexibility. The balance sheet shows a decrease in total current assets from $29,727 million on January 31, 2025, to $21,063 million on October 31, 2025. This shift is partly driven by a reduction in accounts receivable, net (revenue booked but not collected), from $11,945 million to $5,474 million, and marketable securities from $5,184 million to $2,345 million. While cash and cash equivalents slightly increased, the overall reduction in liquid assets bears watching in the context of stated future investment plans.

This filing offers a snapshot of Salesforce’s financial position and management’s forward-looking operational plans, particularly regarding its cloud computing infrastructure. It confirms the company’s intention to fund future investments and commitments through existing cash and operating activities. However, without the context of forensic scores like Beneish’s M-Score or Altman’s Z″, the filing alone cannot provide a robust quantitative assessment of potential earnings manipulation or bankruptcy risk. The available data describes changes in liquidity and asset composition but does not, in isolation, indicate whether the security is mispriced. A comprehensive evaluation would require deeper analysis of revenue recognition, cash flow trends, and a broader industry perspective beyond the scope of these excerpts.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about CRM's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →