The Clorox Company
CLX Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal ProductsNot yet scored
Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for CLX yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.
What the filing actually says.
The filings provided give a narrow view of Clorox. The 10-Q excerpt covers controls, a share repurchase table, trading-plan disclosure, and an exhibit index, but it has no discussion of segment results, product performance, or margins, and no risk-factor text, which the filing incorporates by reference from the fiscal 2025 Form 10-K. Readers may want to look at that 10-K directly for the risk disclosures this excerpt omits. On the annual revenue series, the numbers are steady rather than growing. Fiscal 2025 revenue of $7.1 billion was roughly 0.1% above fiscal 2024's $7.09 billion, and fiscal 2024 was about 4.1% below fiscal 2023's $7.39 billion. The capital-return picture is specific. The 2018 Open-Market Program authorized up to $2,000 million, and $876 million remained available at the end of each month of the third quarter, with no shares bought in January, February, or March 2026. The Evergreen Program, used to offset dilution from stock compensation, has no dollar limit and is not counted in that remaining figure. The two March 6, 2026 credit agreements were filed with a March 10, 2026 Form 8-K. The excerpt does not state their size or terms, so this analysis cannot assess them. Forensic scores: none are on file for Clorox in this dataset, so no Beneish M-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score, or Fog Index is cited here. A Beneish score screens reported numbers for patterns sometimes associated with manipulation, a Piotroski score counts financial-health checks, an Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk, and a Fog Index measures how hard text is to read. None of these can be read for this company from the material provided.
Catalyst.The excerpt provided is mainly the 10-Q's controls, share repurchase, trading-plan, and exhibit sections, so it contains no management discussion of results drivers. The most concrete activity described is the phased technology transformation: the transition of core U.S. operations to a new enterprise resource planning system began in the first fiscal quarter of 2026 and was completed in the third quarter. On annual figures, revenue was $7.1 billion for fiscal 2025 against $7.09 billion for fiscal 2024, roughly flat, after $7.39 billion in fiscal 2023. On March 6, 2026, the company entered a 364-day revolving credit agreement and a term credit agreement.
Hidden risk.The tension a casual reader could miss sits between the ERP cutover and the internal control language. Management concluded disclosure controls were effective, but the filing also says it changed internal control over financial reporting to address processes affected by the ERP implementation, which was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2026. The filing does not report a control weakness, but a system migration across core U.S. operations is the kind of change readers may want to look at closely in later filings. Separately, the company bought no shares in the third quarter, with $876 million still available under the 2018 Open-Market Program. The risk-factor text is not in the provided data, so this paragraph cannot assess those disclosures.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 11.6M
- Change since Aug 31
- +8.5%
- Days to cover
- 3.2
What it tells us
A large group of traders is betting that CLX shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.
Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+8.5%).
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.2 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement
The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) The Clorox Company filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Aug 7, 202610-KAnnual report0EDGAR →
- Aug 3, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Apr 30, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310EDGAR →
- Apr 30, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings); Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Apr 1, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-01)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials); Item 8.01: Other events0EDGAR →
- Mar 10, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-03-06)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation0EDGAR →
- Oct 7, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-11-19)0EDGAR →
- Aug 8, 202510-KAnnual report (2025-06-30)Period: 2025-06-300EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →