Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

CHD Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$97.90
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$81.33 — $106.04
-8% from high
Market cap
23.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
124.0%
P/E
32.2
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Church & Dwight’s Q1 2026 10-Q presents a nuanced picture of operational efficiency, where net sales growth of 0.2% to $1,469.3 million was nearly flat compared to the prior year. Despite this minimal top-line expansion, Gross Margin — gross profit as a percentage of net sales — improved by 140 basis points to 46.4%. However, this gain was offset by rising Selling, General & Administrative Expenses, leading to a 40 basis point decline in Operating Margin — income from operations as a percentage of net sales — to 19.8%.

The forensic accounting scores, including Beneish’s 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, Altman’s Z″ — a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan (Piotroski, 2000), and the Fog Index — readability score (Gunning, 1952), are not available for this filing. Their absence means the filing cannot be quantitatively assessed for elevated manipulation risk, financial distress, fundamental strength, or textual obfuscation through these established frameworks.

The MD&A’s ‘Results of Operations’ section highlights the dynamic between revenue and expenses. While gross profit increased 3.3% and gross margin improved, Selling, General & Administrative Expenses saw a 10.2% increase, rising 160 basis points as a percentage of net sales. This significant increase in overhead outpaced the gross margin improvement, resulting in a 1.5% decrease in Income from Operations. Furthermore, Item 2 notes that the Company did not repurchase any shares of Common Stock pursuant to its publicly announced share repurchase programs during the quarter, with repurchases solely due to shares withheld by the Company.

This 10-Q offers a granular view of Church & Dwight’s financial performance for the first quarter of 2026, detailing specific revenue and expense trends. It illustrates the interplay between sales growth, cost of goods sold, and operating expenses. However, without the quantitative insights from forensic scores, the filing does not provide a direct signal regarding potential earnings manipulation, financial distress, or overall fundamental strength. The document details past performance but does not offer a forward-looking assessment of the security’s intrinsic value or future market trajectory.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-01)### Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (the “Company”) held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annu0
    Read →
  • May 1, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-05-01)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • May 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    Read →
  • Mar 19, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-01)0
    Read →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Jan 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-01-30)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about CHD's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →